Welcome edit

Hello Gendun Drup, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Gendun Drup, good luck, and have fun. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk

Sekargutho Monastery, Tahdra Monastery edit

Hello, now I try to identidy Bhutanese Monasteries, reviewing the Wikipedia articles. There is a problem with these two. I could not found any independent information in Internet or in paper books about these monasteries. Therefore I have applied for deletion of these 2 articles. Please, add more information, proving the existence of them or explaining where they are, making possible to find it on the map or in the literature, to avoid deletion of it. TheNeon (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ura Monastery edit

You created a stub for Ura Monastery. There are several monasteries in Ura, Bumthang, Bhutan - AFAIK none of them called "Ura Monastery". Which Monastery is this article supposed to refer to? The stub article should probably be deleted. Chris Fynn (talk) 19:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sobrang Monastery for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sobrang Monastery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobrang Monastery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Achen Monastery edit

 

The article Achen Monastery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find valid source for topic. The only reference to an "Achen Monastery" other than at WP mirrors is here which is not a reliable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NoGhost (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bomdila Monastery edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bomdila Monastery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Serdzong Monastery for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serdzong Monastery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serdzong Monastery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bomdila Monastery for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bomdila Monastery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bomdila Monastery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thangthong Dewachen Nunnery edit

 

The article Thangthong Dewachen Nunnery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply