Hi, I undid your edit edit

I saw your edit on List of incidents of cannibalism and O9A page, that you had removed the incident in Karelia. Multiple articles covered the cannibalism aspect of it, I am fairly sure I used one of them, but I might have not, so I added a source that definitely did. Just wanted to inform you. Have fun editing! RKT7789 (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

No worries, thanks for adding the link! Gawaon (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tone (linguistics) and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Foreign Secretary on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes edit

I saw your comment at the infobox discussion. The topic of infoboxes on certain featured article biography articles can be highly contentious. The editors who have spent significant time editing those articles are sometimes very passionately opposed (as you can see from the discussion) to adding infoboxes. Many of them are arguing against the use of links in infoboxes. It's a bit of battleground so it requires finding consensus from editors who haven't been arguing about it for decades. Rossini will likely eventually get an infobox, but it will be fiercely opposed like many other articles that eventually found consensus for inclusion. Nemov (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see, and I'm not particularly surprised. I have nothing to do with the Rossini article and don't want to get involved there. I'm just somewhat astonished that he (and many other composers?) don't seem to have an infobox when nearly any other article about a person beyond stub length has one. Hope it'll get sorted out over time! Gawaon (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I volunteer time on RFC discussions and I wasn't aware this was a thing until a year or so ago when infoboxes kept popping up in RFC notices. I was astonished as well, specifically at how nasty some editors were about the topic. It does appear to be getting sorted out over time. There's hope yet! Nemov (talk) 12:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
For your work at James Sligo Jameson. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March music edit

 
story · music · places

Thank you for your support for a MoS change, saying: " The current wording "The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article" is thus clearly outdated and does not reflect reality." - Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you 😊 Gawaon (talk) 22:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I like to see Appalachian Spring on the Main page today (not by me, just interested and reviewed, and a bit proud that I brought the woman's pic to lead and Main page), and I also made it my story. - How do you like the compromise in the composer's infobox? - How do you like the statue (see places)? I was undecided so show three versions ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations on helping to bring that work and picture to the main page! So Aaron Copland's infobox is a compromise? It looks pretty good to me, in any case. Gawaon (talk) 09:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:LiveJasmin on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

MOS:NUMNOTES edit

"Comparable values nearby one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently." Holy (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure that's not meant to apply in cases where one number includes a fractional part and the other doesn't. These are, due to their different natures, not really comparable. Gawaon (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply