Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In veritas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
In veritas (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Gaurishankar 2016, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! In veritas (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Help me!

edit

Please help me with... I have created the page, but dont know how to submit..

Gaurishankar 2016 (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

First, please add all additional available sources and also please see Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Manual_referencing; focus with actual news and NO press releases, social media profiles, interviews or trivial passing mentions. SwisterTwister talk 19:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Pradeep Sardana, from its old location at User:Gaurishankar 2016/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (July 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sam Sailor Talk! 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Help me!

edit

Please help me with... I have saved few more reference links now. I hope this will prove the notability.. if not then please guide me about what all references you are looking for..i will provide the same.

Also, I am a member of Aadharshila, of which Mr. Pradeep Sardana is the president. We all members are keen to release this Wikipedia page, to reveal his immense contribution in the fields of journalism, art, culture and literature. It would be great if we can release this page by 29th July (on his Birthday) and can present him. Need your support for the same..Thanks.. Warm Regards

Gaurishankar 2016 (talk) 21:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

First of all, that's a conflict of interest edit. In addition to sources (showing notability), you have to be neutral. Please create the article in your sandbox first to see if it qualifies to be moved into the article space. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 22:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Edit: I've looked at Draft:Pradeep Sardana, and it looks like your submission has been declined. I can't see notability in the referenced articles. Some are passing mentions, others don't reference what you're writing. For a better outcome, please reference each individual statement or paragraph (using the <ref></ref> tag, and {{cite}} template). Please take a look at Help:Referencing_for_beginners as previously suggested. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 22:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Daniel kenneth (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 04:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (September 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Abdullah Alam (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Pradeep Sardana

edit
 

Hello, Gaurishankar 2016. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pradeep Sardana".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply