Gators bayou
Welcome! edit
Hi Gators bayou! I noticed your contributions to Genocidal intent and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Claim of copyright violation against another editor edit
Here [1] you make a claim that an editor committed copyright violation. I checked the source and can see no such evidence. Copyvio is an extremely serious charge to make against another editor and it should be explained. Can yo please let me know why you think this was a copyright issue? // Timothy :: talk 17:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- It was copied from the source including the word "extinguished". It's not a standard or common word used by modern sources about genocide, so copying is a reasonable assumption for how it ended up in the article. (Destroy is the standard modern lingo. They were equivalent in meaning in pre-Convention debates but as you most likely are aware, "intent to destroy" has been adopted and is now established language). I'm surprised that you don't think directly copying from a source is a copyright issue. Gators bayou (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- What you are describing is not a copyright violation and I have confirmed this with the source. You need to read the guidelines and not repeat this very serious charge against another editor in error. I have restored the text. // Timothy :: talk 17:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well, I think you're wrong and I object to your accusations here. The source says "Armenian existence was extinguished". The article says "Armenian existence had been extinguished". Further discussion is appropriate only on the article talk page. Gators bayou (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- What you are describing is not a copyright violation and I have confirmed this with the source. You need to read the guidelines and not repeat this very serious charge against another editor in error. I have restored the text. // Timothy :: talk 17:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- I could understand considering this close paraphrasing due to somewhat similar wording as the source. However, there's a balance between being faithful to the source (as required by WP:V) and being too faithful. There's also a difference between WP:COPYVIO and WP:close paraphrasing: a couple words that are similar may be close paraphrasing but not copyvio, which would usually require copying several words in a row exactly from the source. (t · c) buidhe 18:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- I support that you're wanting to stay faithful to the source Buidhe, it is something we all contend with where to draw that line. The great benefit of working on a collaborative project is the input of others. Gators bayou (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
"the author's views on the influence of" edit
Literally no reviews state that Ihrig is just writing about his own views. They all say that he is writing about actual influences and historical events. (t · c) buidhe 19:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oh. Sure, I guess that's ok then. It's still a new work and far from established. Very rarely is this type of groundbreaking work accepted in full. It puts us in a bit of a bind how to address it here before the full process of publication and response has played out, but we have to give the reviews some deference too because they are the only secondary we have right now. I guess we can change things later if we have to. Would you mind starting these discussions at the article talk page in the future? Gators bayou (talk) 19:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balance of payments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign exchange. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |