Freedomfighter1112
Blocked
edit
--Akhilleus (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Freedomfighter1112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel the asking of a simple question asked in three different languages should not warrant the indefinite blocking as suggested by ChrisCh because of differences between he/her and Australia2world. The actions have prevented me from contributing to webpages that relate to my local area in the Northern Territory, Australia.
Decline reason:
You are not blocked for your edit, but for sockpuppetry. If you want an unblock, use your original account to request it. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Freedomfighter1112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel the charge of sockpuppetry is unjustified because I created my account on a public computer. Due to differences between ChrisCh and Australia2world I have been prevented from contributing to Wikipedia
Decline reason:
If you want an unblock, request it on your main account. east.718 at 10:39, January 4, 2008
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Accusations of sockpuppetry
editTo whom it may concern,
I would like to express my disgust at being accused of sockpuppetry. The accusation made by ChrisCh is baseless simply because more than myself have pointed out their objections to his extreme censorship of the Padua College wikipedia listing. I would further like to add my anger that a Wikipedia newcomer, Freedomfighter1112, has been indefinitely blocked for expressing his point-of-view. The actions taken by ChrisCh and subsequently Akhilleus I feel are actually in violation of Wikipedia's policy of not attacking the newcomers. It should be assumed that, in good faith, that Freedomfighter1112 would hope to assist the Wikipedia community in a positive way; however, with the actions taken by the two users mentioned previously, he/she has been prohibited from being able to accomplish this desire. We must remember that everyone makes mistakes, and mistakes are meant to be forgiven - especially in the case of a person's first edit. I would like to say only once - I DO NOT KNOW, OR HAVE ANY CONNECTION WITH FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 AND THAT THE ACCUSATION OF SOCKPUPPETRY IS BASELESS AND THE INDEFINITE BLOCK PLACED AGAINST FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 SHOULD BE OVERTURNED IMMEDIATELY.
Sincerely Yours,
Australia2world
Australia2world (talk) 10:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Australia2world
Freedomfighter1112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my main account! This is even backed up by the reference added by Australia2world. In case this was missed, this is what Australia2world posted on my talk page.
To whom it may concern,
I would like to express my disgust at being accused of sockpuppetry. The accusation made by ChrisCh is baseless simply because more than myself have pointed out their objections to his extreme censorship of the Padua College wikipedia listing. I would further like to add my anger that a Wikipedia newcomer, Freedomfighter1112, has been indefinitely blocked for expressing his point-of-view. The actions taken by ChrisCh and subsequently Akhilleus I feel are actually in violation of Wikipedia's policy of not attacking the newcomers. It should be assumed that, in good faith, that Freedomfighter1112 would hope to assist the Wikipedia community in a positive way; however, with the actions taken by the two users mentioned previously, he/she has been prohibited from being able to accomplish this desire. We must remember that everyone makes mistakes, and mistakes are meant to be forgiven - especially in the case of a person's first edit. I would like to say only once - I DO NOT KNOW, OR HAVE ANY CONNECTION WITH FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 AND THAT THE ACCUSATION OF SOCKPUPPETRY IS BASELESS AND THE INDEFINITE BLOCK PLACED AGAINST FREEDOMFIGHTER1112 SHOULD BE OVERTURNED IMMEDIATELY.
Sincerely Yours,
Australia2world[1][2]
I feel that this is evidence enough that my main account is Freedomfighter1112 and the only connection that I have with Australia2world is by the accusations made by ChrisCh and Akhilleus.
Decline reason:
That is not sufficient evidence to call the blocking admin's judgment into doubt. — Sandstein (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.