You should've turned the other cheek. This is how Wikipedia stupidity gets started. They revert your edit with a perfectly valid source whose author's name you misspelled by one letter, and then you retaliate not by reverting the dumb edit but by putting a fact tag on something that should've gotten edited out of the article years ago. Next, they will make absurd, unfounded accusations against you, then a robot will ban you from Wikipedia. Get out while you still can. Incarnatus (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
You're taking Wikipedia too seriously. It's nothing more than digital scrap paper. Think about it: would a real encyclopedia let phony citations stand while striking down valid ones like mine? No. So if Eusebeus wants to think he owns those particular bits of scrap paper, and that those bits of scrap paper are encyclopedic perfection, let him think that. I simply don't have the time to fight non-musical idiots in a sandbox. I have actual music to be a part of. Flutedude (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for your help. I appreciate it, no need to apologize, it's not your fault. I have a residency and I'm happy :D Kgpaints (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)