Fixersfixers

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sea of Japan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Watermint 03:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Liancourt Rocks, you will be blocked from editing. --Endroit 03:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Sea of Japan:

Your recent edit to Sea of Japan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 03:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Jmlk17 03:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fixersfixers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unblock in your name! Unblock in your name! You are very dumb in history! You even don't care for personal opinion! We are righteous Conservative! We are righteous who gets support from Korean Gov. We are 반크 member! ...

Decline reason:

All that is relevant to your blocked status is whether you are willing to edit under Wikipedia rules. Your disruptive unblock request suggests that you are not.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

—C.Fred (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make disruptive edits to your talk page. Such edits may lead to an extension of your block and/or the page being protected against further edits by you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)