Five Mile Walk
Welcome to Wikipedia from Endofskull edit
Hi, Five Mile Walk. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Endofskull (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 08:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 10:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 10:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at AfC Lee Evans (Welsh footballer) (August 4) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tazerdadog (talk) 05:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hello! Five Mile Walk,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at AfC Lee Evans (Welsh footballer) (August 4) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tazerdadog (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer) edit
Hello Five Mile Walk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lee Evans (Welsh footballer)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Evans (Welsh footballer)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Dicko edit
'africansoccer.weebly.com' is not a reliable source, please do not re-introduce the content without finding a better, reliable source. GiantSnowman 11:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Have you actually read WP:RS? GiantSnowman 11:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, and I don't see anything relevant. Answer my questions please. Five Mile Walk (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Because the website is basically a glorified blog, on a standard web hosting site. Who is writing this information? Where has it come from? Where is the editorial oversight? WP:SPS goes into this further. GiantSnowman 12:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Of course it's not a glorified blog. It gives massive coverage and lots of continuous information. It is used on other pages on wikipedia. The Nouha Dicko page now makes no sense whatsoever. You do not own Wikipedia. Who do I complain to?
- Please answer my questions - who is writing this information? Where has it come from? Where is the editorial oversight? Furthermore, where does it actually verify the information you are trying to enter, namely that Dicko made his debut in that game? Luckily another user has managed to find an alternative source which is actually reliable and actually confirms it was his first game. GiantSnowman 17:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- My edit was an improvement over what was there. The information there now is slightly less true and less well presented than my edit made it. If you didn't like the source, you could have tagged it rather than arrogantly remove the improvement. The site I used as a source is respected, and followed on twitter by senior figures and football clubs; it is also used as a source by several pages on wikipedia. This argument you have now come up with about it not being clear that Dicko was making his début is nonsense: he only has two matches so far, and they are both on that site and both easily found. Your edits actually made the final line of the section completely nonsensical for several hours. I came here to edit wikipedia and try to improve the information, not to be treated with arrogance by a clot. My edit was an improvement; your decision to remove it was not driven by a wish to improve the information on the site. Dicko is a striker at Wolves now. If you want to leave winger there at all, it needs to go after striker. Where Mali play him is another matter. If they want the best out of him they'll put him through the middle with Sako to his left.
- Firstly the WP:BURDEN is on you introducing the material to find an appropriate source to support it, not me. Secondly he is a winger, see this amongst others. Thirdly please remain WP:CIVIL and do not lower yourself with childish insults. GiantSnowman 19:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- The very link you give advises that material should be tagged rather than simply removed. You should take this on board. Your burden is to tag, rather than remove. Nouha Dicko joined Wolves on loan as primarily a winger, and didn't do particularly well. He returned to Wigan and in a subsequent loan at Rotherham did well as a striker. Since Wolves signed him permanently he has been used primarily as a striker. He is a striker for Wolverhampton Wanderers. Whether winger should be there too is debatable, but putting winger first is simply wrong. He has not scored all those goals from the wing. Wikipedia is currently carrying imprecise information because of your edits. If you think my behaviour is childish, you might examine your own. Simply removing people's edits is not civil. Contemptuous comments of "Have you actually read WP:RS?" are not civil. You need to stop removing edits without giving editors the chance to argue their case or improve citations. That is what WP:BURDEN actually advises. It even encourages you to attempt to improve citations yourself before you remove or tag material. Five Mile Walk (talk) 11:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Not per WP:BLP, which you seem depressingly ignorant of. "Whether winger should be there too is debatable" - why? I have provided a reliable source which describes him as a winger! "putting winger first is simply wrong" - why? His primary position is described by NFT as being "right winger", with 'other positions' as "centre forward, left winger." What reliable sources are you using to justify your comments? Or is it just personal preference? GiantSnowman 11:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The very link you give advises that material should be tagged rather than simply removed. You should take this on board. Your burden is to tag, rather than remove. Nouha Dicko joined Wolves on loan as primarily a winger, and didn't do particularly well. He returned to Wigan and in a subsequent loan at Rotherham did well as a striker. Since Wolves signed him permanently he has been used primarily as a striker. He is a striker for Wolverhampton Wanderers. Whether winger should be there too is debatable, but putting winger first is simply wrong. He has not scored all those goals from the wing. Wikipedia is currently carrying imprecise information because of your edits. If you think my behaviour is childish, you might examine your own. Simply removing people's edits is not civil. Contemptuous comments of "Have you actually read WP:RS?" are not civil. You need to stop removing edits without giving editors the chance to argue their case or improve citations. That is what WP:BURDEN actually advises. It even encourages you to attempt to improve citations yourself before you remove or tag material. Five Mile Walk (talk) 11:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Firstly the WP:BURDEN is on you introducing the material to find an appropriate source to support it, not me. Secondly he is a winger, see this amongst others. Thirdly please remain WP:CIVIL and do not lower yourself with childish insults. GiantSnowman 19:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- My edit was an improvement over what was there. The information there now is slightly less true and less well presented than my edit made it. If you didn't like the source, you could have tagged it rather than arrogantly remove the improvement. The site I used as a source is respected, and followed on twitter by senior figures and football clubs; it is also used as a source by several pages on wikipedia. This argument you have now come up with about it not being clear that Dicko was making his début is nonsense: he only has two matches so far, and they are both on that site and both easily found. Your edits actually made the final line of the section completely nonsensical for several hours. I came here to edit wikipedia and try to improve the information, not to be treated with arrogance by a clot. My edit was an improvement; your decision to remove it was not driven by a wish to improve the information on the site. Dicko is a striker at Wolves now. If you want to leave winger there at all, it needs to go after striker. Where Mali play him is another matter. If they want the best out of him they'll put him through the middle with Sako to his left.
- Please answer my questions - who is writing this information? Where has it come from? Where is the editorial oversight? Furthermore, where does it actually verify the information you are trying to enter, namely that Dicko made his debut in that game? Luckily another user has managed to find an alternative source which is actually reliable and actually confirms it was his first game. GiantSnowman 17:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Of course it's not a glorified blog. It gives massive coverage and lots of continuous information. It is used on other pages on wikipedia. The Nouha Dicko page now makes no sense whatsoever. You do not own Wikipedia. Who do I complain to?
- Because the website is basically a glorified blog, on a standard web hosting site. Who is writing this information? Where has it come from? Where is the editorial oversight? WP:SPS goes into this further. GiantSnowman 12:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, and I don't see anything relevant. Answer my questions please. Five Mile Walk (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)