Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Griffith. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —dgiestc 06:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


I'm trying to improve the page. Why can't I be allowed to improve it as per requitred?

OK, sorry, that was a misunderstanding. All I could tell was that a huge amount of text was being deleted with no edit summary left, which superficially looks a lot like vandalism. Please remember to leave a descriptive edit summary. —dgiestc 07:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jeremy Griffith for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Griffith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Griffith(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. John Vandenberg (chat) 14:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply