FinTGM

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, FinTGM, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! N2e (talk) 00:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm N2e. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Starship development history, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. N2e (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Starship development history, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Seriously, you need to add a source for making a change to the numbers in an article.

Alternatively, if you have a source that supports your view elsewhere in the article, then use that source, and also clarify what you are doing in an edit comment. Cheers. N2e (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

SN5 status

The tweet referenced does not support completely support it is going to be scrapped, only the mass simulator. Chris B @NASASpaceflight replies that its mass simulator might just be removed to use SN5 for a HLS mockup. I'd wait until we have more sources to say definitely that it will be scrapped. Thank you for your other contributions to the article. N828335 (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Update: I see that other sections are being scrapped. Feel free to add this back in, just make sure to add the necessary references. Thanks! N828335 (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Starship development history

Thank you for your continued contributions to Starship development history! However, it seems that you are putting a large amount of details in the table of prototypes. Please put all but a short summary in the article body, there are sections for all the major prototypes, like SN7.2. Also note that the table is too wide to fit, even on my large monitor. Proof tests, wet dress, and preburners is a bit much... Keep in mind everyone of these numbers would need a source, anyways. N828335 (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Skingo12. I noticed that in this edit to Starship development history, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skingo12 (talk) 09:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, I'm Gial Ackbar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Starship flights, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gial Ackbar (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Starship development history, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Starship SN15 and BN3

You deleted my addition of Starship SN15 and BN3 without explaining why. This change has been reverted. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 00:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I have explained why on the talk page of the List Of Starship Flights Article. Scroll down to the bottom to find it. Thanks for your cooperation. FinTGM (talk) 07:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

New Dispute Resolution Request Started!

There is now a dispute resolution request about whether we should add SN15 and BN2 to List of Starship flights. Please add your comments. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

New Draft

You are requested to edit and add resources to Draft:Starship SN11. It has been declined a few times after I created it, so I would like help from another editor. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I wouldn’t recommend creating a page for SN11. The details of the testing campaign for SN11 are already detailed on the Starship Development History page.FinTGM (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Sheila Bordelon moved to draftspace

Hi, I have decided to move Sheila Bordelon to Draft:Sheila Bordelon for now since it has no content and you have indicated that you will be working on it. You can move the page back to Sheila Bordelon after you have finished creating the article. Thanks! ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

New WikiProject

You are invited to edit Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject SpaceX (company). 64.121.103.144 (talk) 00:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Rocketry

Wikipedia ads	file info – #283

Attention! You are needed at this WikiProject! You are a candidate for Assistant Project Coordinator because of your hard work on WikiProject Spaceflight. If you are interested, let me know. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Starship Campaign Refs

FWIW, I didn't introduce refs to 'The starship campaign' on Starship development article and am perhaps a little sceptical of it being a RS. I just thought we should have consistency between the table and the future prototypes text. Reverting my edit has reintroduced that inconsistency. So you may want to change the future prototypes section too. Ah sorry you have got to that now. C-randles (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

However re SN17, NasaSpaceflight is a RS and per [1] ref says "SN17’s fate is known, with sections of what was to become that Starship now observed as being scrapped at the Production Site." I think that is good enough. C-randles (talk) 15:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sheila Bordelon

Hello, FinTGM. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sheila Bordelon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Sheila Bordelon

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Sheila Bordelon, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Engine failures in intro?

Hi, could you please provide some input at Talk:SpaceX Starship orbital test flight#Engine failures in intro? Thanks, RAN1 (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Removal of engine failures in starship flight test article

Hello, you recently reverted a section claiming that are no confirmed sources on the loss of engines, but SpaceX themselves have confirmed in the description of the flight test on their website that "The vehicle experienced multiple engines out during the flight test, lost altitude, and began to tumble.", and even though the exact number is up for debate, the fact is that SpaceX confirmed that there were multiple engine failures, and the telemetry in the bottom of the official SpaceX livestream shows that there were at least 5 engines that were malfunctioning by the end of the flight, and 3 were malfunctioning upon launch. And I, Horizon206, already cited this official SpaceX statement in my edit (that you later removed). I believe that since SpaceX has confirmed that engine failures are indeed something that happened, it is fair to include assumptions regarding that information, especially from well-trused astronomers and articles. Perhaps you missed the SpaceX statement stating that it was an engine failure, but if you were to have checked the sources on my edit you would have seen that I have cited SpaceX themselves. I think that your removal of my section was overzealous, especially now that there is a different edit that says there were engine failures and doesn't even have a citation for it. I think my edit should be restored, and I would like to hear your opinion about this now that you know my side. Thanks, Horizon206 (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Please go to the talk section in the “Starship Orbital flight test” page. Thanks. FinTGM (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)