Notice

The article Hype in science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#DICDEF, possibly SYNTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Wikidata weekly summary #322

Wikidata weekly summary #323

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #324

Wikidata weekly summary #325

Wikidata weekly summary #326

Wikidata weekly summary #327

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 12

Newsletter • August 2018

This month: WikiProject X: The resumption

Work has resumed on WikiProject X and CollaborationKit, backed by a successfully funded Project Grant. For more information on the current status and planned work, please see this month's issue of the newsletter!

-— Isarra 22:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #328

Wikidata weekly summary #329

Category:Academic journals in the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Academic journals in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #330

Wikidata weekly summary #331

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #332

Wikidata weekly summary #333

Wikidata weekly summary #334

Wikidata weekly summary #335

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #336

Wikidata weekly summary #337

Wikidata weekly summary #338

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fgnievinski. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #339

Wikidata weekly summary #340

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #341

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fossil beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oceanic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #342

Wikidata weekly summary #343

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13

Newsletter • December 2018

This month: A general update.

The current status of the project is as follows:

  • Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
  • I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
    • Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
    • If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
  • Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.

Until next time,

-— Isarra 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #344

Wikidata weekly summary #345

Wikidata weekly summary #346

Wikidata weekly summary #347

Wikidata weekly summary #348

Proposed merger at Intermediate frequency

If you add a proposed merge template, you are really obliged to provide a rationale for merging and link the discussion from the template. I can't reply to a rationale that has not been made. SpinningSpark 15:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

@Spinningspark: if it's not obvious, please ignore. fgnievinski (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
If it's not obvious, and you can't be bothered to make a case for it, I'm going to remove it. SpinningSpark 18:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #349

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Proposed deletion of Linear profile

Notice

The article Linear profile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In its present form, with one paragraph and no references, this is only a dictionary definition, and should be expanded or deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #350

Nomination of Oceania (continent) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oceania (continent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceania (continent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- BilCat (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #351

Wikidata weekly summary #352

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ephemeris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Position (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #353

request for administration

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verify references (talkcontribs) 03:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #354

Wikidata weekly summary #355

Wikidata weekly summary #356

Wikidata weekly summary #357

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #358

Wikidata weekly summary #359

Wikidata weekly summary #360

Renaming sections

If you want to rename a section, you should either check for incoming section links, or add an anchor, see: Template:Anchor Freelance Intellectual (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #361

Wikidata weekly summary #362

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #363

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Multipath interference into Multipath propagation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #364

Wikidata weekly summary #365

Wikidata weekly summary #366

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #367

Junior professor listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Junior professor. Since you had some involvement with the Junior professor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #368

A tag has been placed on Category:Academic journals associated with universities and colleges of Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #369

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 14

Newsletter • June 2019

Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.

There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:

  • A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
  • We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!

Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:

  • Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
  • WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)

Until next time,

-— Isarra 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #370

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

Celestial navigation (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Celestial navigation (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Celestial navigation (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 22:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #371

Wikidata weekly summary #372

Wikidata weekly summary #373

Wikidata weekly summary #374

Wikidata weekly summary #375

Storm surge (disambiguation) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Storm surge (disambiguation), does not comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm surge (disambiguation) has been accepted

Storm surge (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #376

Wikidata weekly summary #377

Wikidata weekly summary #378

Wikidata weekly summary #379

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Kaula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

AdF of an article you worked on

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging) if interested. Dicklyon (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

Wikidata weekly summary #380

Wikidata weekly summary #381

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15

Newsletter • September 2019

A final update, for now:


The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.

Regards,

-— Isarra 19:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

Speedy deletion nomination of Microregion (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Microregion (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

Category:Continuous journals has been nominated for discussion

Category:Continuous journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Real estate

I have undone your move of Real estate to Real estate business. That would need a discussion on the article talk page with a clear consensus for the move. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

Category:IEEE people has been nominated for discussion

Category:IEEE people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Checking comment on revert

Good morning! If I understand your comment on this revert correctly, you would be okay with removing Category:Award winners from Category:Fellows of learned societies if simultaneously Category:Awards would be removed from Category:Fellowships. Is that the correct interpretation? Marcocapelle (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

@Marcocapelle: at least that would be consistent, although I'm not sure it'd be desirable. fgnievinski (talk) 15:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zonal and meridional flow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Direction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Meteorological organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Meteorological organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

Use of ";"

Hi, Fgnievinski. I noticed that you added new sub-(sub-sub-)section headings to the article Median. Please don't use ; (Name here) for that purpose; use == (Name here) == or similar instead. ; is meant to indicate categories of a list, so it doesn't show up in the table of contents or have handy section-editing links. Thanks, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 01:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

Illegal

Hi Fgnievinski, I have removed Informal from Illegal because I couldn't understand why it would be there. I'd be happy to revert myself if I've made an error. Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pole (surveying)

Notice

The article Pole (surveying) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This doesn't seem very useful. The first paragraph is about a different topic than the second, and the picture is something different entirely. And all three are redundant with other articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – bradv🍁 02:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Fgnievinski! You created a thread called Pending edits in semi-protected page? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


The Signpost: 29 March 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:ChemPubSoc Europe academic journals

A tag has been placed on Category:ChemPubSoc Europe academic journals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peeters (publishing company)

Notice

The article Peeters (publishing company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society

Notice

The article IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sub-group of notable organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

Proposed deletion of Chinese Science Citation Database

Notice

The article Chinese Science Citation Database has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article should be deleted and redirect to Web of Sciences (article)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Postconfused (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Angular diameter is not what you mean there

Sorry for the second revert at Beam divergence, but please take a closer look. The article you are linking to, Angular diameter, is describing a different thing than the quantity you mean to refer to. The phrase you quoted in your summary (from Beam diameter rather than Beam width) mentions "angular width", not "angular diameter". Your text would not be wrong without the erroneous link to angular diameter, but by itself the phrase "angular diameter" is vague. The original text is clearer. I don't see any way to fix it that is better than simply reverting it, so I have reverted it again. --Srleffler (talk) 03:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

Category:Academic journals associated with non-profit organizations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Academic journals associated with non-profit organizations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

English literature

Hello. I've moved your request from WP:RM/TR to Talk:English literature because it is not a clearly uncontroversial request. Station1 (talk) 22:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rating has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rating has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

Nomination of Cartography and Geographic Information Science for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cartography and Geographic Information Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartography and Geographic Information Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Journal stubs

You've created a bit of journal stubs recently. It would be really helpful if you expanded them a bit more per WP:JWG, and added the infobox (there's a useful script for that here). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Headbomb: yes, it's in my to-do list, it just might take a while. fgnievinski (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indoor positioning system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

"Rank deficiency" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rank deficiency. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 17#Rank deficiency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Line (geometry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Half-space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

Category:Videos by year has been nominated for merging

Category:Videos by year has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Earth from satellites

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Earth from satellites requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Earth from space

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Earth from space requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Position line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Fgnievinski,

I noticed that you made a helpful edit to Skyhook Wireless. Thanks again, Bekkadn (talk) 08:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sentinel-6

Hello there, while reviewing the pending drafts at AfC, I came across this draft which was submitted by you earlier today. I also noticed that after submitting the draft for review, you created a redirect at Sentinel-6 which is blocking the move. To be honest, I was ready to accept this but now I wonder whether you think this topic is suitable for a standalone article at the moment or not. It appears that you have an expertise in this field so I prefer to take my decision on accepting this draft after knowing your opinion. Regards. Hitro talk 15:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@HitroMilanese: yes, please move the draft over the redirect, I've only created it because I thought it'd take much longer for the AfC to be processed. The subject will attract a lot of attention from the press by November. Thanks. fgnievinski (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentinel-6 has been accepted

Sentinel-6, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 17:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Science Publishing & Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximum elevation figure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VFR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of First images of Earth from space for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First images of Earth from space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First images of Earth from space until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deeday-UK (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Society of Remote Sensing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indian Society of Remote Sensing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ChunnuBhai (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Comment Please consider archiving your talk page. H:ARC. ChunnuBhai (talk) 15:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)