FenderRhodesScholar

Fair use rationale for Image:PhylacteryFactory.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PhylacteryFactory.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Adding external links to crawdaddy.wolfgangsvault.com

Hello. Are you affiliated with wolfgangsvault.com? You have been adding a large number of external links. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

(copying from User talk:Paul Erik)

Hi there, Paul. Yes, I am affiliated with Wolfgang’s Vault. Is there a problem with the external links? They are all either to reviews, like the All Music Guide links, or to pertinent articles/interviews. I’m pretty new to editing aspect of the site; if there is a better way to integrate material, please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FenderRhodesScholar (talk • contribs) 17:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi FRS and thanks for your response. No, I was not concerned with any specific problems with the links, but you adding them to a large number of articles is not a good idea in the eyes of Wikipedians. Wikipedia has guidelines about conflict of interest and I would also suggest that you review the guidelines at WP:SPAMMER, which suggests, If your product (or external website) is truly relevant to an article, others will agree—try the talk page. Thanks very much and feel free to ask any questions if you find there is something unclear about those pages. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, COI guidelines apply to adding links for album reviews too. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, FenderRhodesScholar. You have new messages at Paul Erik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ida reviews

Very nice! Badagnani (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Phylactery Factory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phylactery Factory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phylactery Factory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PhylacteryFactory.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PhylacteryFactory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)