Which newspapers and corporation are you referring? and from whom was letter and fax you received? What is the purpose of your "investigation" --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:28, 11 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

To avoid any appearance of entrapment when interacting with the item under investigation, the policy of our corporation and its subsidiaries is to declare a public notice of intent. Please note that this is not a legal requirement. To ensure neutrality in the writing of the investigative article, it is also the policy of our corporation to never reveal the identity of the newspapers involved or the source of accusations against the item being investigated. Please rest assured that the letter sent to us and its content will not be used in the writing of these articles. Only the independent findings of this and subsequent investigations will be used in the writing of the articles.
The purpose of my initial investigation will be to ascertain the effectiveness of this method of encyclopedic creation. The readers of our newspapers, magazines, books, etc., have shown interest in past articles relating to Wikipedia, but are skeptical about whether this method can produce encyclopedic articles superior to other reference sources. Thank you for your interest. --Felice L'Angleterre 08:27, 11 September 2005 (EDT)

Hi, I have deleted your "Notice of Intent" from the various talk pages. Talk pages are for discussing changes to the content of articles (See Wikipedia:Talk page for details), not for posting personal messages about yourself. See Wikipedia:Tutorial for further details about how to contribute. Welcome to Wikipedia! --JW1805 00:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. I only have to post them. --Felice L'Angleterre 08:27, 11 September 2005 (EDT)
I think you accidently deleted more than my Notice of Intent from Articles for deletion/Unalienable rights. Would you be a dear and restore the legal definitions? --Felice L'Angleterre 08:37, 11 September 2005 (EDT)

Given that "Felice L'Angleterre" doesn't turn up a single Google hit -- strange results for someone who supposedly edits two newspapers -- this yet another insultingly obvious sockpuppet of "Zephram Stark" Zephram Stark (talk · contribs) and can safely be ignored. --Calton | Talk 23:57, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Felice L'Angleterre is my user name here are Wikipedia. To ensure neutrality in the writing of our investigative articles, it is the policy of our corporation to not reveal the identity of the writer to the item being investigated. --Felice L'Angleterre 08:27, 11 September 2005 (EDT)
Blocked indefinitely. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:09, September 12, 2005 (UTC)