iOS request edit

At our meeting on Saturday, we discussed photo documentation of buildings. Since there was very positive feedback for doing this, would you be interested in writing the Unvisited app for iOS? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes I would. I've gotten a lot of requests for an iphone/ipad version. I've got a development environment all set up for ios, and have done a couple of simple apps. The toughest thing about ios, is that apple has to approve the app. Faolin42 (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Is there anything that we need to do in terms help, or will it just take time? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just time, as far as the coding goes. I'm guessing it'll take about a month to have a beta version available for iOS devices. But a couple of things that might help are... 1) Suggestions for a better name for the App, if anyone thinks it's necessary. I have mixed feelings about the name 'Unvisited'. Nice in a way, but misleading. 2) Suggestions on how the user interface could be improved. 3) Suggestions on missing features (if any). For 2 and 3, someone would need to use the Android version. No guarantee I would take the suggestions, but they would be nice to have. I've implemented about half the suggestions I've gotten so far. Faolin42 (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
At first, I thought, "Oh, the Places to Go," but then I realized that wouldn't fit. Maybe "Go to It!" or, "On the Go," would be good starts, since they imply the purpose of the app, and are short enough to fit. Lpgeffen might also be interested in this, as he is a photographer who came to our last meeting. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not only a photographer but a software engineer and professional beta tester. Please keep me informed! Paul (User:Lpgeffen) (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
There's an android version of the app already available at Unvisited. If you have an android device it would be useful to me to get some feedback on the android version before I port it to iOS. See points 1,2,3 above. Faolin42 (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Do you happen to have an update on iOS development? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm actively working on it (a little bit at a time). Today I was working on the layout part so it would automatically adjust for different devices and orientations. In keeping with Apple's design philosophy, it'll be stripped down to the essentials. Not as many settings/help screens/bells and whistles as the Android version. I think I'll stick with the name Unvisited. I like the name in German "Nicht Besucht". Or the Italian "Deserto". I'm pretty sure I can make a version available for beta testing next week. I'll try to post some screen shots this weekend. Faolin42 (talk) 00:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh, that's great! I know I would love to do a photo documentation session this summer with the Boston folk if possible, so having this would certainly make things easier. Also, if you're going to be down on the Cape before July 4th, Harwich High School is scheduled to be demolished shortly after that date, so if I don't get a photo of it before then, it might not be a bad idea to target this in a sweep. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Got some preliminary screens for the iOS version of Unvisited. Still many details to implement. Faolin42 (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Wow, those look great, and I cannot wait to use that in the future! If it is ready, I will be going to Berlin tomorrow, so I would love to use the beta app if it is available then. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
The odds are slim, but we could give it a shot. How long will you be in Berlin, and will you have a Mac with you or access to a Mac? The standard Apple ad-hoc testing depends on the testers having a Mac in addition to the iPad/iPhone. Anyway, the first thing I would need is your iPad/iPhone device name and device id (Also known as UDID or identifier) On my iPad the device name is "John's iPad" and the id is a 40 digit hex number. If you have a Mac you can connect the iPad/iPhone to, the instructions are at apple.com/MaintainingProfiles in the section titled "Locating iOS Device IDs Using iTunes". You can email the info to faolin42@ymail.com. Faolin42 (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
It would probably be good to know your iOs version. That's on the same screen as the device name and id. For instance my version is 7.1. Faolin42 (talk) Faolin42 (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'll be here until Monday, but I do not have a Mac to connect right now. I am sure others do at the conference, so I would have no problem doing that later today. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think I've figured out how to deliver a beta version. Once I get your iPhone/iPad name and id, I can add it to the testing profile, and email you an Unvisited.ipa file to install from the Mac to your iPad/iPhone. But don't go out of your way to do it. I generated trips in Berlin from the Android version (see User:Faolin42/Berlin), and there's not that many places in en:wp that need to be photographed. There's probably a lot more back home. Faolin42 (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Edit-a-thon invite edit

Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons edit

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
 

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:

We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time.

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Name preference edit

I'm adding some names to images, e.g. File:2014 WikiConference USA (Group B) 27.JPG

It occurred to me that some people might prefer their real name, some might prefer their user name. Do you have a preference?

Can you recall the name of the person on the right? I know I heard it, but I did not retain it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I actually prefer my real name, John Phelan. On the right was User:Slowking4 according to the conference schedule. Faolin42 (talk) 16:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
And thanks for doing this, by the way! Faolin42 (talk) 16:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated, thanks.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

New England Wikimedians summer events! edit

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events! edit

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

sa.wikipedia.org problem edit

Hi ! I want to share some problems with you, because you are connected with sa.wikipedia.org. Our admin is neglecting us. Admin is not involving us in policy making process and when we are propose some requests, then also he don't even reply us. I and many other users of sa.wikipedia.org are felt helpless against our Admin. Please guide us in this problem. if you will not take it seriously, then in future it may be a big problem of sa.wikipedia.org. NehalDaveND (talk) 11:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Announcing: NRHP Fall Photo Contest! edit

The WP:NRHP Fall 2014 Photo Contest will kick off at midnight eastern time on Monday September 1! This is an opportunity for all folks with a camera (or a sketchpad and scanner, doncha know) and an interest in the National Register of Historic Places to just have some low-key fun and maybe get some barnstars. Come submit some photos or pose a challenge to your fellow editors. And maybe, just maybe, along the line we'll improve the encyclopedia... (Note that while this contest is intentionally concurrent with Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 and the Wikipedia Summer of Monuments, there ain't gonna be no cash prizes or press releases here. But compete in 'em all if you like - we won't be jealous.) — Ipoellet (talk) 22:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

 

This wiki-kitten is here to say thank you for adding GPS coordinates to my article The Partisans (sculpture). Thanks!

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arnor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • (Sindarin, "Great Middle Haven") was a great harbour founded at sometime during the Second Age by [[Númenórean] explorers along the coast of Minhiriath. The harbour was the first permanent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Laconia, NH Federal Building edit

Hello. I'm sorry to bother you on your talk page, but I was wondering if you might have any photos of the interior of the Federal Building in Laconia, N.H. Specifically, I'm looking for a photo of the mural(s) painted by Philip Guston and Musa McKim as part of a Section of Fine Arts initiative in 1941. Thanks very much in advance for your time!-RHM22 (talk) 03:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Watchmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imprint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

whoops! I've corrected it. Faolin42 (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest guideline edit

Thanks for coming to WP:COIN for help with your COI question. The following text is pro-forma and doesn't indicate that you have done anything wrong. But please read it.

  Hello, Faolin42. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Brianhe (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural depictions of lions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA edit

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unvisited broken? edit

Hi there!

I tried preparing a few walking trips in advance of a visit to Ukraine, but no suggestions were returned, and the app said it was retrying the query a number of times.

That seems to me like an API compatibility problem. Could it be Unvisited was not updated following one of the breaking changes to the API?

I'd have happily looked into the code and offered a patch myself, but I don't see a link to the source code.

Any help appreciated, and thanks for Unvisited! I love it! Asaf (WMF) (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Asaf (WMF) (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Curse you :) edit

... for getting to the Petersham District 5 School before me. (I was just there yesterday -- I also took the District 4 School while I was in the neighborhood, since I suspect it will also be listed eventually.) Magic♪piano 19:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Whoops - sorry about that! That little school house got a lot of activity this weekend! Someone was just pulling away as I got there, and there were a couple of hunters across the road from where I parked. I saw the other school house, but passed it by, wondering if I'd taken a picture of the wrong schoolhouse. Faolin42 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Faolin42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Faolin42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photos edit

Many thanks for all the great photos of New Hampshire places that you've been putting up! --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA edit

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic
 
 

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

1–5pm - come by any time!
Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner!

We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Copyeditor's Barnstar
I've noticed you fixing various misspellings across the site--thanks! Marquardtika (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Faolin42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alert edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for List of Masonic buildings in the United States edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Masonic buildings in the United States —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doncram (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you actually edited on the List of Hibernian buildings, where there may be the same issue. Your participation would be welcomed. --Doncram (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Faolin42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Warg (Middle-earth) edit

 

The article Warg (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this fictional animal passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Bundushathûr" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bundushathûr. Since you had some involvement with the Bundushathûr redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Langwell (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Langwell (Middle-earth). Since you had some involvement with the Langwell (Middle-earth) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Girdley Island" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Girdley Island. Since you had some involvement with the Girdley Island redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Duin Dhaer" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Duin Dhaer. Since you had some involvement with the Duin Dhaer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Thistle Brook (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thistle Brook (Middle-earth). Since you had some involvement with the Thistle Brook (Middle-earth) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"West Emnet" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect West Emnet. Since you had some involvement with the West Emnet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"East Emnet" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect East Emnet. Since you had some involvement with the East Emnet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

""Dor-en-Ernil"" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Dor-en-Ernil". Since you had some involvement with the "Dor-en-Ernil" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Angamaitë" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Angamaitë. Since you had some involvement with the Angamaitë redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BenKuykendall (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Treegarth" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Treegarth. Since you had some involvement with the Treegarth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Stockbrook" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stockbrook. Since you had some involvement with the Stockbrook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thanks for documenting (in your user space) some of the merging of Middle-earth articles that has been going on. The WikiProject is not really active any more, but might it be possible to put a copy of what you are doing there? There might also be some useful history at the quality statistics page, where it is possible to see how the number of redirects and so on varies over time. Carcharoth (talk) 10:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I've been wrestling with how to present it. Having so many Middle-earth articles on Wikipedia was one of the things that initially attracted me to Wikipedia. Mostly, I took the list of articles I had - from years ago - and split them out by what has happened to them in the last six years. I need to add an additional section for notable (to me) deleted articles. Faolin42 (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Eboennin" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eboennin. Since you had some involvement with the Eboennin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Afterlithe" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Afterlithe should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Afterlithe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Winterfilth" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Winterfilth should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Winterfilth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Harvestmath" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Harvestmath should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Harvestmath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Halimath" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Halimath should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Halimath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Rethe (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Rethe (Middle-earth) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Rethe (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Blooting" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Blooting should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Blooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Blotmath" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Blotmath should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Blotmath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Wedmath" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Wedmath should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Wedmath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Casarrondo" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Casarrondo. Since you had some involvement with the Casarrondo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Undeeps" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Undeeps. Since you had some involvement with the Undeeps redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Dírhael" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dírhael. Since you had some involvement with the Dírhael redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Barangils" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Barangils. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#Barangils until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Marhwini" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Marhwini. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 21#Marhwini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Aerlinn" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aerlinn. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#Aerlinn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Angamando" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Angamando. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#Angamando until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Firienfeld" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Firienfeld. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#Firienfeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Denweg" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Denweg. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Denweg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 18:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Quendya" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Quendya. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Quendya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking edit

I've noticed you're linking a lot of common words in articles. This is generally frowned upon as "overlinking", it creates a visual mess and the links are not always helpful. I'd suggest slowing down and picking your links more specifically. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 22:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I was worried about overlinking. I was trying to restrict linking to pages that had a fewer than average number of links already. Lately I've been linking to emotional/hot button terms, like 'political correctness', 'revenge', 'execution', 'death threats', 'neo-Nazi', 'Hitler', 'white supremacist', 'fascist', 'troll' 'satan', etc... I will stop the linking to these common words. Faolin42 (talk) 23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply