LeRoy Rooker edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of LeRoy Rooker, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://connect.educause.edu/eprofile/124552. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, FERPAExposed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to LeRoy Rooker. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy of biographical information about living persons. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to LeRoy Rooker. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, FERPAExposed, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because It implies that user is disruptive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you.

 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, FERPAExposed, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply