User talk:EytanMelech/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Iphone 8's
Hello ItsDaBunnyYT,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Iphone 8's for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, iPhone.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
September 2017
Hello, I'm Darius robin. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to iPhone have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Darius robin (talk) 12:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Reliable sources
Please note that I have reverted your edits to Paris Smith as you added information to the article that is not supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include independent sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (tertiary websites such as movie and celebrity databases do not meet the criteria). For the specific guidelines and instructions related to biographies and birth dates, please see WP:BLP and WP:DOB. Thank you,-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
No conflict of interest
Hi Ethan, noting your username, if you have a personal relationship with the subjects of any articles, such as Laurel Parmet, it would be best to disclose such WP:Conflicts of Interest. It is best to avoid editing articles about yourself, your family, or friends. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way. See Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide for a basic introduction to the subject.
Perhaps see also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with close associations.
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Anon423 (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
While I do share the same last name as the person in the article, I have never met the person in real life, not have spoken to her online.
Ethan Parmet (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Laurel Parmet for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Parmet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Comment on Gabby Petito and MWWS
Hi, I would appreciate it if you would comment on whether it should be stated in the lead of the Gabby Petito article if its gotten a lot of attention because of missing white women syndrome. .CaptainPrimo (talk) 23:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- It is possible that it could be given a mention in the article, but I do not think it should go in the lead of the article. Perhaps it should go in a separate section regarding media coverage and public reaction. It is not an important or defining matter of her death, and shouldn't be put in the spotlight of the article. Thanks
- EytanMelech (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Happy Passover!
  |
Happy Passover! |
|
Hello EytanMelech, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this passover. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy passover or easter, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Happy Passover}} to other user talk pages. |
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 13:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! EytanMelech (talk) 19:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Myron Levoy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Myron Levoy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, EytanMelech. Thank you for your work on House of Luzárraga. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SunDawn: Thank you so much! I enjoy researching for articles like these. It started out as a translation of a stub-like Spanish article with no inline citations, so I sought out to prove them myself. Let me know if you have any similar reccomendations on topics that could expanded/improved upon! EytanMelech (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Myron Levoy
On 8 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myron Levoy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before becoming a successful children's author, Myron Levoy was an engineer doing research on nuclear-powered spaceships for a mission to Mars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myron Levoy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Myron Levoy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Gusano (slur) is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! EytanMelech (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Don’t hop on bandwagons to nowhere
I recently reverted a section you replied to on Talk:James O'Keefe because it had been addressed like three times already. Please do not waste other editors’ time responding to the same dead questions over and over. Dronebogus (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 21:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Klaus Teuber
On 11 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Klaus Teuber, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Hraniv
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hraniv, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EpicLLOYD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exeter High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- No I didn't? I literally go to the page and it takes me to the specific page for the New Hampshire page. EytanMelech (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grange Estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wilcox.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Lautaro Bavaro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Fintan Coleman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Alejo Daireaux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Brady Daniel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Fermín Martínez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article KoiKoi Nelligan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Quentin Newcomer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Owen Sheehy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Marcos Young (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Lautaro Bavaro for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lautaro Bavaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Alejo Daireaux for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejo Daireaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Marcos Young (rugby union) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Young (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Owen Sheehy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Sheehy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Brady Daniel for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady Daniel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of KoiKoi Nelligan for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KoiKoi Nelligan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Fermín Martínez for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fermín Martínez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Quentin Newcomer for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Newcomer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Fintan Coleman for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fintan Coleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Eden Detention Center
On 25 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eden Detention Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in March 1991, hundreds of inmates rioted at the Eden Detention Center over a lack of vegetables on the cafeteria menu, causing an estimated US$250,000 in damages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eden Detention Center. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eden Detention Center), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Failure to show good faith
You don’t seem to have assumed god faith at Talk:Sound of Freedom (film). Doug Weller talk 19:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Is there a particular reason for having undone your previous comment? EytanMelech (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I shouldn't have used a template with an experienced editor. Doug Weller talk 07:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)