Ewakened

computability articles

I noticed you have started adding information to computing articles such as Non Universality in Computation and Turing machine. As you must know, the results obtained by Selim Akl do not reflect on a "universal computer" in the ordinary sense of computability theory because these results make requirements about computations per time that are not permissible in the setting of classical recursion theory. I am concerned that readers may gain from your article the false impression that Akl's work reflects on Church's thesis as it is commonly understood by recursion theorists. I have asked for the input of other mathematics experts here. Please feel free to comment there, rather on this talk page. CMummert · talk 23:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-universality in computation

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Non-universality in computation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  --Lambiam^Talk 21:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Since our discussion has not succeeded in resolving the issues with the article, in particular that of notability, I've now nominated the article for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-universality in computation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( --Lambiam^Talk 12:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)). You are free to edit the content of the article during the discussion to address the issues raised, but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion.  --Lambiam^Talk 12:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non Universality of Computation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non Universality of Computation, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non Universality of Computation is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non Universality of Computation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non Universality of Computation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non universality in computation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non universality in computation, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non universality in computation is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non universality in computation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non universality in computation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non universality of computation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non universality of computation, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non universality of computation is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non universality of computation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non universality of computation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non-universality of computation

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non-universality of computation, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non-universality of computation is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non-universality of computation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non-universality of computation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non universal computing

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non universal computing, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non universal computing is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non universal computing, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non universal computing itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Non-universal computing

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Non-universal computing, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Non-universal computing is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Non-universal computing, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Non-universal computing itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alexis Ohanian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ny/description|website=Tilt.com|publisher=Tilt.com|accessdate=25 August 2014|title=Black Girls Code]}}</ref> In May 2014, Ohanian used [[Tilt.com]] again to launch "Save Net Neutrality: Billboard in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)