Wikipedia

User talk:ErrantX/Archive/2013/August

< User talk:ErrantX‎ | Archive
Latest comment: 10 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 28 August 2013

A beer for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  Thanks for picking up review o the Battle of Osijek, I appreciate it very much! Tomobe03 (talk) 11:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
My pleasure. If I get time I'll try to pick up your other battle articles as well :) --Errant (chat!) 12:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
12   Operation Barclay (talk)         Add sources
590   Nick Jr. (talk)     Add sources
33   9th Armored Division (United States) (talk)           Add sources
143   Joan Pujol Garcia (talk)   Add sources
18   Phantom World War II Divisions (United States) (talk)       Add sources
19   John Cecil Masterman (talk)       Add sources
1,280   Date rape drug (talk)   Cleanup
276   XXX Corps (United Kingdom) (talk)     Cleanup
494   Breakup of Yugoslavia (talk) Cleanup
98   Harbin International Ice and Snow Sculpture Festival (talk)         Expand
628   Harbin (talk) Expand
7,225   PHP (talk) Expand
464   Operation Sea Lion (talk) Unencyclopaedic
14   Mile Mrkšić (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
179   Republic of Serbian Krajina (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12   Tributes to Led Zeppelin (talk)       Merge
26   Led Zeppelin covers and tributes (talk)     Merge
112   Kingdom of Croatia (medieval) (talk)   Merge
898   2013 protests in Turkey (talk) Wikify
18   Siege of Mostar (talk)       Wikify
8   Human rights in Serbia (talk)       Wikify
1   Brayden Pierce (talk)           Orphan
7   Herbert Fingarette (talk)           Orphan
3   Forensic search (talk)         Orphan
2,732   The Hidden Wiki (talk)         Stub
6   Ranken dart (talk)           Stub
17   Nathalie Sergueiew (talk)           Stub
878   Lolita City (talk)         Stub
29   Seccomp (talk)           Stub
5   Brentford Chiswick and Isleworth Times (talk)         Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

image deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The image you just deleted is being used as evidence in an ANI on the user that requested the deletion. Please restore it so that the editors involved in the ANI can view the original post (The editor has subsequently modified his post to remove policy infractions) Gaijin42 (talk) 16:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

No, I'm afraid I can't because it is a copyright violation. I'm not sure the best approach here but probably post a link to a screengrab hosted elsewhere - although that is technically not allowed either it will probably not be leaned on by an admin during the AN/I --Errant (chat!) 16:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

ANI

I clicked here because it says "chat". What a neat feature... Please let me know if you have anything unclear that I can shed the light no. --Michael Haephrati 17:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.haephrati (talk • contribs)

Hijiri88 continues to provoke

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am sorry to update you that Hijiri88 continues to harass. He sent me 3 emails today and after I stopped responding to him, he published the same old claims that were already dealt as part of the ANI. I really don't want to get back into this fight with him, as he seems to have taken it very personally and I would like to stay out of it. However, he is sabotaging the AfD and I kindly ask you to look into it. --Michael Haephrati (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
   The Military History A-Class Medal 
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History WikiProject, I hereby award you the A-Class Medal for your outstanding work on Dudley Clarke, D-Day naval deceptions, and Operation Copperhead. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Very nice, thanks!! :) Now for the next three... --Errant (chat!) 10:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Help Needed

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have noticed that this user is a new editor that needs help. He is editing several articles adding to them a reference to an article he has written. Besides the notability question, technically he didn't insert the cites correctly. This is the article where I have undone his edits. Following my comments in his talk page he now seeks for advice. Michael Haephrati (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Another editor threats to remove images from an article

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

While I am doing my best to work on new articles, help others, etc. Gaijin42 is trying to pick a flight and provoke me. After he uploaded a screenshot of my personal blog page, claiming its his own work (file you have removed), he is picking screenshots from the Rashumon article which another user (someone from my family, but not me) has uploaded at 2011. He has commented here, probably to get me to admit it is me. I don't think this is how things should work. You can investigate any suspicion but it should not be a reason to remove sources and images from an article. I don't understand why he is so anxious to edit this article, especially before the AfD is over. Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Michael Haephrati If a family member (not you) uploaded those files, but said that they are "Michael Haephrati", they are copyright violations, and impersonating you, which makes them double violations of policy. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
That was around 2011. I don't remember and don't have time to deal with that. If you suspect anything, don't use these images to investigate me... I have no problem uploading them again myself. You also picked images I have uploaded (the last 2), so please remove the deletion request. It is clear that you are trying to provoke me after I have complaint that you uploaded a screenshot of my blog and claimed it is his own work (the file was of course removed). Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Here are the possibilities. Pick your poison.

  • You are both users. Therefore you are a sock of a blocked user.
  • You are the real MH, User Haephrati is not. All their uploads are impersonation and copyright violations, and should be removed.
  • They are the real MH, and YOU are the impersonator. Those files can stick around, and you are blocked as an impersonator.

Do, to sum it up, your claim is that someone else, obtained files that you created (in particular two selfie photographs of you), created an account on wikimedia and wikipedia which claimed to be you, uploaded those files, added those files to articles about products you wrote, got discovered and blocked as socks, you came along later completely unrelated, you used that photo on your userpage (how did you know it had been uploaded to wiki commons?)    Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me

Gaijin42 (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

step away

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I will step away, but would you consider either re-adding the image links (or some other way of pointing to the images) (diff perhaps?) so that the administrator who handles the SPI has access to the information? Gaijin42 (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. :) Yes, I will do that. I've endorsed the SPI for a CU so it can be processed, which hopefully will resolve things for good. --Errant (chat!) 17:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Please remove from ALL places the insulting comments such as "It sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me", etc. and so on. I will cooperate with any claim and will provide the administrator any information needed, but stop playing detective. You don't need the links to specific photos. You check the contrib. of all users mentioned in the SPI. MH (talk) 18:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Manning on AN

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've moved the discussion to the ANI subpage per a request on my talk. I was in the process when you closed the thread on AN so I replaced your close with a redirect. I hope that OK? --RA (✍) 11:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes that is fine! Thanks for doing that :) --Errant (chat!) 11:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 
Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ErrantX/Archive/2013/August&oldid=580152162"