For which wish to give message for Erik E VestBot, hope writed in User Talk:Erik Evrest.

October 2009 edit

October 2009 edit

 
This account has been temporarily blocked from editing because it appears to be running a bot script without approval. This is in violation of Wikipedia policy. All automated or semi-automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they are performing safe and useful functions, and are not abusing system resources. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Just a note that I don't actually believe any such bot exists, but it's "creator" says it does. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erik E VestBot (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Erik Evrest

Decline reason:

Your name is not a valid rationale for an unblock request, please read the guide before requesting an unblock Q T C 08:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request of Erik E VestBot edit

Hello Erik E VestBot. Erik E VestBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Erik Evrest (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply