Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazareth Area Middle School (August 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ElmoTheRockStar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Middle school edit

Thank you about that! I did a perfect job of the draft, Nazareth Area Middle School. It was constructed in 2008 and was completed in 2009. Kindergarten through 3rd grade used to be at the Nazareth Area elementary schools, 4th, 5th and 6th were placed at the new intermediate level from the former middle school, built in 1998. The new middle school contains 7th through 8th. The Nazareth Area High School, built in 1955, remains unaffected by the grade changes. 4th grade now moved back at the elementary schools. The intermediate school now contains 5th through 6th. It had a new swimming pool. I'm requesting the draft to move into an article I did a really great edit! ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article request edit

@Theroadislong I've fixed some issues, now I have to request an article when it's resubmitted and declined. I've added grade changes to the draft. ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazareth Area Middle School (August 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Xander Mobus, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Blocked edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElmoTheRockStar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked for a Check User Block Account. ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You have been blocked as a checkuser block, which I guess is what you are trying to say. However, that is not a reason to unblock you. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElmoTheRockStar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry! I promise not to be a checkuser block. Instead, I will make useful contributions instead.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra: Sorry for pinging you seemingly every few hours, but it looks like they're onto a new account (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElmoTheRockStar). GPL93 (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra: (sorry for ping) He is most probably at it again (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElmoTheRockStar). Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 19:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Shocked! Shocked I say! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PBS Kids logo (2022).svg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:PBS Kids logo (2022).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nate (chatter) 21:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #62944 is closed. edit

Was socking Sept 8, 2022. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #82525 edit

I have reenabled talk page access, as per UTRS appeal #82525, so the user can make their unblock request here. This account is not cleared by WP:CHECKUSER of block evasion at this time. That would need to happen if a compelling unblock request was made here. --Yamla (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply