Elblanco123

paper-papers speedy deletion

I believe there may be a misunderstanding. This page is being prepared for company by myself. Please help me understand if something is wrong that I'm overlooking -oh my- before I could reach out, the page is GONE. In an attempt to get our coding done well, we had not posted much so we can place it properly, yet before we got our coding evaluated, the page is gone. In the future, do we need to place all relevant content at one posting? Papublishing (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)papublishing

this does not apply to above post

Hi Elblanco123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

CFL entries

They are not autobiographies, I'm just an Als fan who wants entries for their Grey Cup winning players.

And what do you know, anyways? Mind your own business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaeffel (talk • contribs) 20:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please clarify

Hi Elblanco123, thanks for reviewing the article Rajanagar (Odisha Vidhan Sabha constituency), with a maintenance tag. Can you please point me the weasel words, so that it will be helpful for me to improve the article. --Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Bare urls

Nowhere on the hundreds of articles I've created have I used a bare url. Ever. Dru of Id (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Lestock Adams

Explain your actions please. Lestock Adams is a cricketer who played cricket for Cambridge University (as per ESPNcricinfo here) and is not in any way an attack page. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 20:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

I have raised the issue at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for another admin to review and remove the tag so I can continue editing the article. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 20:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Stop being a dick

I'm not the only one. Stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaeffel (talk • contribs) 20:58, 16 April 2014‎ (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lestock Adams

Hello Elblanco123, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lestock Adams, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly an attack page or negative, unsourced BLP. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Please stop tagging articles until you answer the concerns being raised on your talk page. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please respond

Looking at some of your contributions, specifically [1] & [2], I am concerned that you may not fully understand what you are doing when you use page curator to tag articles. Can you respond please? If you don't respond, administrators may have to take other actions to try and prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. One of us would happily give you a hand and show you the ropes. --S.G.^(GH) _ping! 21:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Also here. Tanbircdq (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm Hack. An edit that you recently made to La Romana, La Romana seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hack (talk) 03:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Bongo Radio block evasion?

Greetings! I see you've tagged Bongo Radio for speedy deletion as recreated by a blocked user. Who's the blocked user, or what title was this page at before where I can see the pattern? —C.Fred (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dhavda nana

Hello Elblanco123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dhavda nana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Articles about populated places are not subject to speedy deletion except in very few circumstances (copyvio for example). Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Jurassic park builder

Created by User:Fishlover2, tagged by User:Elblanco123 with {{speedy deletion-blocked user}}, and deleted by User:Alexf as "G5: Creation by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block". But, he isn't and wasn't blocked. What am I missing here? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Mistake. Re-deleted as A7. -- Alexf^(talk) 09:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Incorrectly nominating articles for speedy deletion

Please take care when nominating articles for speedy deletion, as (from looking at your talk page) you have been commented on this by others before. The article I wish to make comment about is Loki Laufeyson (films). There was nothing in it that could remotely be described as an attack, and labelling it as such and warning the editor can be seen as biting the newbies. Ok, so the article wasn't needed, but the content (with references) could be added to other articles. Warning editors unnecessarily harshly can frighten them off the project.

I strongly recommend you review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before nominating any other articles. Stephen! ^Coming... 06:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

In addition to the one above, you have also badly nominated Westbourne Park Primary School for speedy deletion. There is NO evidence to suggest that the editor was under a ban or block, so to suggest otherwise is very wrong. And before you nominate it for speedy under notability, I should remind you that educational establishments are not elegible for speedy under notability requirements.

I have been reviewing your speedy deletion nominations, including some that have been deleted, and found more examples of incorrectly nominated articles. I will be keeping an eye on your future nominations, and if things do not improve I will be asking advice from other administrators as to what can be done. Badly nominating articles for speedy deletion, particularly where they include accusations of attacks, bans or blocks, will frighten away new editors and could be classed as more damaging to the project than a few stub articles. If you have any questions about speedy deletion, or on what I have written here, please don't hesitate to ask me.Stephen! ^Coming... 07:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Kalimba (singer). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Kalimba is his stage name and thus article is titled Kalimba. If you disagree, request a page move here to gain consensus instead of edit-warring. Erick (talk) 03:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Cristina Vee, you may be blocked from editing. Please see talk page. The consensus was to move to Cristina Vee. -AngusWOOF (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Paul Walker

Please be a bit more conservative with your requests for page protection. Over protection hinders the development of our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Phil Collins seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Christine Cavanaugh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christine Cavanaugh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arcángel (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominican people. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit War

Your recent editing history at Oscar de la Renta [3] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

	+	

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You have been warned you are in violation of 3rr. More edit like this and you can be blocked CrazyAces489 (talk) 04:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jordin Sparks. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Aspects (talk) 09:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Madeleine Martin

According to [4] she has dual citizenship from her mother and identifies as Canadian. According to Canadian American, Americans born to Canadian parents are Canadian Americans. Unless you have some a better source to contradict this that you're not putting in the article for some reason, I don't understand why you continue to revert this.

You reported 124.149.162.65 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to AIV claiming "vandalism after final warning; vandalism after recent release of block" despite the fact that neither of those are remotely true and none of their edits appear to be vandalism. Mr.Z-man 05:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Why?

Hi Elblanco123, Why do you have delete my contributions on articel Liza Jacqueline? The voice of Liza you can hear it on Quest for the codex. Please delete not truth information. And please answer it.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 17:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Eve Torres

An unexplained revert like this is poor form. I gave reasoning for my edits, which you have not refuted in any way, choosing instead to blindly revert without explanation. Why do you think the Infobox person is needed? Why are you inserting unsourced information, despite there being a long-standing note in the article regarding her birth date being disputed? Are you not providing sources for your edits? Why aren't you providing useful and informative edit summaries to explain your edits after being reverted? NiciVampireHeart 16:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

WTH is ""Wrong else?" supposed to mean? I've no intention of edit warring with you, but you're being ridiculously and willfully obtuse, and it's not appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 16:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Your recent editing history at Eve Torres shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Elblanco123 reported by User:Loriendrew (Result: ). Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 22:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Eve_Torres#Infobox

Please start discussing your edits instead of unilaterally edit-warring with people to force your preferred version on the article. I have started a discussion at Talk:Eve_Torres#Infobox, please join in. NiciVampireHeart 13:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Eve Torres. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content like you did on the Annette Moreno page, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Karst (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I see you've been warned. I'll state that your changes to Jaci Velasquez were also not necessary and have been reverted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content like you did on the Ana Victoria page, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Karst (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ashanti (singer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dwpaul ^Talk 02:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hikaru Utada. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. She is a music artist first, so the infobox should be used, not the generic infobox person. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hitomi (voice actress)  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OttonielWhite, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Conifer (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elblanco123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

that has nothing to do with me because I have reverted several editions in Wikipedia please, things are not so and if I am responsible I deserve to be blocked indefinitely

Decline reason:

You are blocked indefinitely. It seems even you agree that it's well-deserved. Huon (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elblanco123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

already from now on forward no volvere to vandalizing any article nothing more you disable Twinkle before being blocked indefinitely.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but this is almost incoherent. You are blocked for sockpupperty, and you will need to address this. Kuru (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elblanco123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Elinteligente10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I want to change my user name to unlock and not vandalizare the article because you already disable the Twinkle for a time.

Decline reason:

You have made no effort to understand why you are blocked -- despite it being explained above -- and you do not have sufficient command of the English language to contribute effectively. Talk page access revoked. MER-C 03:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Daddy Yankee

Portal:Daddy Yankee, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Daddy Yankee and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Daddy Yankee during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 08:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)