El Pollo Diablo

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 13:26, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks dude! Just the stuff I needed... :-) --El Pollo Diablo | Talk 09:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Petri Nets

Hi, El Pollo Diablo, Welcome to Wikipedia. I just responded to your questions in the talk page for this article on Petri nets. The article itself is a camel -- a horse designed by committee. I have routinely witnessed miracles in Wikipedia, and I'm hoping this article will eventually become one ... (visualize praying hands). As it stands now, it is a mess, but not as much of a mess as it was before I had gotten ahold of it (or so I would like to imagine).

Are you familiar with the LNCS volume 3098 on Advances in Petri Nets? In it there is a paper on Petri nets and dependability that you might be interested in seeing. In my response to your questions I mentioned extensions, and this volume is full 'o them. Rüdiger Valk's paper on Object Petri Nets takes extensions to Petri Nets to novel extremes. Come to find out, his stuff could be useful in modelling the dynamics of blood borne infection/resistance on the cellular level, so the application domain for Petri nets is really broad. The whole moral of this story is that there ain't no such thing as a "standard Petri net". Vonkje 02:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Football links

Hi,

I noticed you were new and had been editing football articles, so I thought I'd give you a few links that it took me a while to find. Hope they're useful.

• User:Sjorford/Football - comprehensive list of football articles on Wikipedia
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Football - place to discuss football articles
• Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Association football - good page for editors who are interested in football

CTOAGN 16:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Alex Ferguson

I reverted your deletion as I felt that leaving the article with nothing on his achievements at United was a bit extreme. I've put a few ideas on the article's discussion page.

CTOAGN 23:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive

Hi El Pollo Diablo,

The Football AID is restarting. The next project article is to be selected on January 1, 2006. Please look at the nominations and take part actively. Thanks. -Aabha (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Football AID 15-21 January

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

UEFA Champions League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Gay Cowboys

• "At the 2006 Golden Globes, a film about gay cowboys, Brokeback Mountain, won Best Film" -- I removed that, from Chef's Chocolate Salty Balls it has nothing to do with the article, please dont add things that do not have to do with the article. Mike (Reply to my comments/questions on my User Talk Page) 12:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Football AID 23 - 30 January

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Bobby Charlton has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Raymond E. Feist articles

Hello,

While searching around the "What links here" list attached to the Raymond E. Feist article looking for other Wikipedias who may be fans, I found you. Currently I am working on expanding the related articles of the Riftwar books, but there is a lot of ground to cover with 20 books to look through. I am hoping to gather other editors who may be willing to spend a little time to help out. There are articles which need expanding and clean-up, and I don't think I can do it alone.

The current articles are (red links to be started): The series articles:

• Riftwar
• Krondor's Sons
• Empire Trilogy
• Serpentwar Saga
• Riftwar Legacy
• Legends of the Riftwar
• Conclave of Shadows
• Darkwar Saga

Other articles:

• Midkemia
  • Triagia
    • The Kingdom of the Isles
    • The Empire of Great Kesh
    • The Kingdom of Roldem
    • The Kingdom of Queg
    • The Eastern Kingdoms
    • The Free Cities of Natal
    • The Keshian Confederacy
    • Elvandar
    • The Grey Towers
    • Stone Mountain (Midkemia)
    • Dorgin
  • Novindus
• Kelewan
• Worlds of Raymond E. Feist (title pending) - this article would cover those other worlds visited through rifts and the Hall of Worlds, and even the City Forever and the Garden.
• Races of the Riftwar sagas (title pending)
• Gods of the Riftwar sagas (title pending) - not only are there gods of Midkemia and Kelewan, but one other full pantheon mentioned in Krondor: The Betrayal.

And there is probably more that I haven't even thought of yet, which I am hoping you might.

This message has been sent to AbsoluteZero, Alkanen, Deathphoenix, El Pollo Diablo, Epideme, Painbearer, and SM247.
—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 22:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

How do you feel about editting an area that will more than likely contain spoilers of future events that take place in the various series? - LA @ 22:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked IP

The IP of what I can only assume must be all of Loughborough University campus has been blocked. While I appreciate that there has been a vandal from this IP, blocking the entire thing is counterproductive as there is at least one (me) genuine editor here. Surely there is another way? --El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 14:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

It's really a tough problem, actually. The autoblock is simply a 'secondary' block that happens to the IP of a named user when his account is blocked. The admin can't see the IP, so there's no way he can know what he's autoblocking. The autoblock stops persistent vandals or spammers from simple making another account and going right back to what they were doing five seconds later. The balance, of course, is that other good editors can get blocked for a few minutes, and if it happens often enough they stop contributing. I'm really sorry if this keeps happening - please hang in there and know that we try to fix autoblock damage as fast as possible. Kuru ^talk 01:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

James Milner Career section Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I didn't ask you specifically I asked a lot of users. But this was sorted a while ago. Incidentally this article is now a FAC. Buc 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Counties

I've responded on my talk page! Owain (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

PL Map

Well, there's hard to find a good colour, you could remove the lines of the subdivisions, and just have the country outline — chandler — 06:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Removal of Premier League fixtures

I removed the fixtures because of the on-going copyright discussions for safety reasons. Sorry if you put a lot of work in that, I know what you've been through. But better to be safe than running into a legal suit with some "strange-thinking person"... Hockey-holic (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Manchester United task force

Hi there. I noticed from the list of participants at WP:FOOTY that you are a Manchester United fan. A task force has been set up to help improve articles related to Manchester United, and we are looking for participants to help with the effort. If you would be interested, please add your name to the list at the task force's page. Thanks. – PeeJay 10:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Our Monthly Collaboration

Hi. The Man Utd Taskforce which you recently joined has selected Alex Ferguson article as the collaboration of the month. We plan that all the members will try to improve this article to be a splendid article or maybe even a featured one. Sincerely, HeLLboy2HeLL (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Irish Football

Time to get this kick started again.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

English Cup competitions

I noticed you had started creating more articles for FA Cup seasons,a project I started about 9 months ago when only the 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 seasons had articles. Would you be able to do the same for the Football League Cup as there are only articles stretching back to 2002. Cheers. 03md (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Cheers for your response. The Carling Cup website doesn't have results but this link to Soccerbase does. I will have a go at the results for recent years and see how I go. Well done on your FA Cup progress - just a few months ago the amount of coverage was pathetic! I started a while ago but made little progress. Thanks. 03md (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, I was wondering whether you still planned to have a go at a League Cup article as you haven't responded. Thanks. 03md (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. I will also have a go at some articles soon. You could start with the articles for 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 or 2005-06 as there are already stub articles for these. 03md (talk) 09:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Have you had a chance to start the articles yet? 03md (talk) 22:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Well done - I checked back at about 5.30pm and the article looks good. 03md (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that you had created the page for the 2004-05 Carling Cup on your userpage so I have copied the information to the article. Well done with your work. 03md (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

FA Cup 1962-63

On 15 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article FA Cup 1962-63, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

FA Cup project

I just wanted to let you know that the FA Cup articles from FA Cup 1994-95 to FA Cup 1998-99 are incomplete and , as you are doing articles for the old competitions, would you be able to complete these for consistency. Thanks. 03md (talk) 08:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. I have been trying to expand some of the cup final articles. I will try and complete the stub league cup articles in the next few days and let you know when they're done. Did you use Excel to put the results into the article and, if so, how.03md (talk) 09:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Good work on FA Cup articles

Noticed you've been doing good work on FA Cup articles, have a barn star for your work.Mick Knapton (talk) 08:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		A well deserved virtual award for your fine work on FA Cup articles.Mick Knapton (talk) 08:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

English cups

Cheers. I have been trying to expand some of the cup final articles. I will try and complete the stub league cup articles in the next few days and let you know when they're done. Did you use Excel to put the results into the article and, if so, how.03md (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Could you email me the spreadsheet either on matchamnetgear@aol.com or d_matcham@hotmail.co.uk and I will make a start on the League Cup articles. 03md (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the email but I'm not quite sure what program to paste the data from soccerbase into? Could you help me. 03md (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

FA Cup 1928-29

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FA Cup 1928-29, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.unblocked.org/surf.php?q=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9GQV9DdXBfMTkyOC0yOQ%3D%3D. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

FA Cup move

I've corrected the template; I thought I already had done so, but it appears not. Without having a script, however, it would be time-consuming to move all the respective articles. I moved that and a couple of others, due to GA or FA nominations, which would be best with the correct endashes in the wikilinks or text. I guess you would be better asking someone with the correct tools or scripts to move the rest of the pages with the press of one button. Perhaps ask at WT:FOOTY. Peanut4 (talk) 20:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

1915 FA Cup Final

Thanks for your recent additions to this page, adding a little colour and some details 86.142.235.136 (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Taunton Town

Hi, I've undone your change to FA Cup 1930–31 which changed the redlinked Taunton Town (1) F.C. to link to the current Taunton Town. AFAIK, the current club was only founded in the 1940s, and isn't the same club as the first Taunton Town. Both the FA (in their FA Cup Archive) and FCHD here refer to them as Taunton Town (1), to distinguish from the current club, which FCHD has here. No doubt if an article ever gets written for it, a better title could be chosen, perhaps along the lines of Accrington Stanley F.C. (1891). By the way, I'm amazed by the amount of work you've put in on the FA Cup seasons and finals, they're a tremendous addition to the project. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Unused football kit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Gas Holders

I noticed you said you work on gas holders. I also do as an Instrument Techinician in the Yorkshire area. I was hoping to enhance the page with information on the workings of gas holders, however being as what was the Transco region (or NEGAS in my region) has long since broken up, I was wondering how the system differed from region to region as writing on their workings in one region only would be somewhat immaterial to Wikipedia. I was wondering if it would be possible to share information on the mechanical/ instrumentation/ electrical variations across the counrtry. Mtaylor848 (talk) 00:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject devoted to Lancashire?

Hi, I have noticed that you are from Lancashire and I was wondering if you have heard of the new WikiProject group of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria. If you are interested in joining please feel free to become a paricipant and help us achive our goals. If you do join I am looking forward to your contributions. 93gregsonl2 (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

FA Cup

In all of your entries I have looked at you suggest that 'Some matches, however, might be rescheduled for the Sunday... '. This is incorrect, as no FA Cup or Football League matches were played on Sundays until 1973-4. I think that this was due to Sunday trading laws, and it was only allowed in 73-4 to get round the industrial problems which resulted in the Three-Day Week(Mundellan (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, El Pollo Diablo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!