Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Roger Needham. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Roger Needham, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Heligoland 22:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Roger Needham. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user . As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
If you believe this block to be unjustified, you can contest it by adding {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing reason with an explanation of why you think this is an unjust block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 23:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply