Welcome to My Talk Page edit

Please take the time to review my user page for an overview about me, my interests and the projects and articles that I am working on in Wikipedia. While I will make a sincere effort to respond to your posts here quickly I would ask that you bear with me as I do not visit Wikipedia daily. Edward Lalone 03:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and hello edit

I just thought I'd say that although I disagree with you on the AfD debate, I wanted to say hello. Your work on Utah politics and LDS issues is uncommonly good.

Also, although it was lost in other edits, I wonder whether you approve of the changes I made to Utah#Politics. Cool Hand Luke 03:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see no problem with your edits of Utah Politics and the changes are good ones. A lot of work needs to be done on the section to make it more NPOV so any changes that attempt to do so are actually beneficial to the article. Edward Lalone | (Talk) 03:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Government of Utah - my bad edit

Ed,

First, thanks for your work on Utah governemnt topics.

If you remember, I had transferred the Government section of the Utah Portal to an article, Government of Utah, but I neglected to add a redirect to the portal page. So I have copied your edits from January 21 from the portal to the article and set up a redirect. To be proper, I should have done a move instead - I'll have get an administrator to fix that. — Zaui (talk) 18:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just to follow-up - the history of your edits to the old portal page has been transferred to the Government of Utah article. The old portal page has been deleted. — Zaui (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

A Democrat in Utah edit

You must be lonely. That's why I moved to California.  :) Orangemarlin 20:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Utahhouseseal.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Utahhouseseal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Racism & Mormonism edit

I have resided in Utah for close to a decade, Mormonism and racism seem to be intertwine much like a marriage. What most fail to understand is that the core and base of most religions usually evolves from love, goodwill towards others and the general practice of testing ones fate throughout his or her life. I have enough insight to understand that we, humans are creatures of habit and great limitations. Throughout history many atrocities have been commited by men towards other men, perhaps it is in our nature to be destructive, harbor hatred and ignorance. I have read and heard that the Mormon religion did not accept blacks into their ranks until 1978. I have also read a passage about how blacks are considered filthy. On the other hand, claims are made by the Mormon church of being anti-discriminant towards blacks. Incidently, it is also written in the U.S. constitution that all men are created equal and discrimination based on race, sex and religion is a direct violation of the law. However, racism is very much alive, discrimination based on sex and religion still exists as well. I am not offended by the doctrines of the Mormon religion. The ambiguity of the Mormon church seems obvious. The unfortunate part of it is that it affects all the members, even the ones that are not part of discriminating factor. I have accepted the fact that a great deal of people are racist, will continue to be racist and will most likely teach their children to be racist. As I mentioned before, we are creatures of habit and many limitations. What I do not agree with is the recant of the original doctrines of the Mormon church, to do so displays indecisiveness and falsehood. The general population of Utahans still believe that blacks are filthy, inherently inferior and are cursed. By accepting blacks in their church at the present seems parallel to saying "I am sorry for discriminating against you for so long. It is politically incorrect now. I will allow you to be in my presence, but I will keep a watchful eye on you." I do not believe in saying "I am sorry", what has been done cannot be change and I beleive that many do not want to change it just to save face. Many white Mormons are truthfully against racism and discrimination but are few in numbers as opposed to their racists counterparts. We live in a complex world where putting up facades and being politically correct is the new trend. Deep inside, not much has changed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.7.239.114 (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Did you know? Nomination edit

Hi. I've nominated Quentin L. Cook, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on October 6, where you can improve it if you see fit.Alan 18:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assistance on a project I am working on edit

Since you live in Utah, maybe you can help me with something. I have been working on a project dealing with bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton regarding the Winter Olympics and their respective World Championships in the FIBT and International Luge Federation, mainly with athletes, but I am also focused on the tracks these athletes compete on, including the one for the 2002 Winter Olympics in Park City, Utah. I still have some biographies to do and will not be able to focus on the tracks until around November 15, 2007. Would be interested in assisting on the Park City track? Please advise. Chris 00:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Member edit

Hi Ed, I just would like to tell you that I just posted a proposal on the project Utah talk page. I notice that you are one of the most active in the committee. I would like to know your opinion on my proposal. Thank you. User: Adrian Comollo 20 November 2007 For your ease I am attaching my proposal also here: Hi, this is user:Adrian Comollo, already a Utah wikipedian, and I would like to partecipate to this project. Since we are going toward globalization and dialogue among cultures, I propose to you a section that could be located for example under "People" and would be entitled "Utah National Groups". It would briefly describe the various groups such as Germans, Swedish, Tongans, Venezuelans, Russians and so on. A few lines of history, some info about businesses, social activities, relevat people. I am teaching a course that includes this diversity topic at the SLCC and my students would be happy to find accurate info. Please let me know if you like this idea. 20 November 2007.

Adrian —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian Comollo (talkcontribs) 23:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Help offer edit

Hi Ed, this is Adrian again. I talked to my friend Many who is a student of PoliScience. He said that he would be happy to work with me to help with your Legislature project, such as preparing pages for the members of the House and Senate, or similar. Please let me know if you like this idea. User: Adrian Comollo 20 November 2007

from Adrian again edit

Hi Ed, I hope you read this message. Please let me know about help offer of you Legislature project. Best wishes, Adrian Comollo (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blendtec edit

Hi! Sorry if this seems a bit forward but I'd like to make a picture request. It is for the Will It Blend? article. I would like to request a picture of the front of Blendtec's HQ (cf. [1]) under a free CC license. Sorry again if this is too forwards or not possible for you. Please respond here, Harris Morgan 00:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC).Reply

An advice from you, please edit

Hi Edward, Thank you for your previous help. I am trying to get info from the village pump but no answers yet. I am wondering if you know something about procedures in case of cancellation. An article of a friend of mine in Italy has been proposed for cancellation (religious topic), and he was contacting people in his field to get their opinion and eventually their vote. He has been labeled with vandalism! Do you know if this is the case also here or it is a specific Italian situation? Thank you much for your help. Adrian Comollo (talk) 06:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Utah Wikipedia Meetup edit

Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup?

If you are interested in a Utah meetup, please visit Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Utah and voice your interest.
Not in the Utah area? Check out other meetups around the world!

--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWBReply

Im gay is that fine edit

hi is it ok if im gay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.238.8.15 (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's none of my business whether you are gay or not since I don't know you and have no reason to care either way. Edward Lalone | (Talk) 03:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Merrillcook.jpg edit

File:Merrillcook.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Merrillcook.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Merrillcook.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration edit

Where do I begin?

  • "His one-day trek last week to Denmark -- which failed to convince the International Olympic Committee to award the games to his hometown -- made it the 16th country Obama has visited since taking office on Jan. 20."

    is waaaaay to similar to

    "His trip to Denmark, that failed to convince the International Olympic Committee to award the 2016 Summer Olympic games to Chicago, made Denmark the sixteenth country Obama visited since becoming President on January 20, 2009."

    There's restating the facts, and then there's taking out a few words and replacing them with synonyms.
  • It is recentism because it's a tiny piece of trivia about a year which isn't even over until January 20, 2010.
  • What do the Olympics have to do with the Obama foreign policy overall or with how many countries he's visited? That part reeks of recentism.
  • The significance is nearly nil unless you qualify it with sourced information about how this number of visits affected, contributed to, or is a symptom of the Obama foreign policy.
  • Why was it placed in the "Background" section? That part is talking about everything leading up to Jan. 20, 2009 then we're suddenly at Jan. 20 2010 in a single paragraph.
  • It states "Obama visited more countries in his first year as President than any other president". "President" is redundant and should only be capitalized is it's referring to the man rather than the office.
  • It's also foreseeing something which hasn't happened; it needs to say something to the effect of "Obama has already visited more countries" rather than making sound like the year has already passed.

Basically, this is the same thing (s)he's tried to add the Obama biography article. It was hugely inappropriate there and it continues to be in the "Foreign policy" article. If it continues to violate WP:COPY, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:RECENTISM, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NOTE, and WP:TRIVIA it really can't stay. DKqwerty (talk) 20:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the text to "President Obama has already visited more countries during his first year in office than any other president. His trip to Denmark, that failed to convince the International Olympic Committee to award the 2016 Summer Olympic games to Chicago, made Denmark the sixteenth country Obama visited since becoming President on January 20, 2009" since I agree with your 7th point about this forseeing the end of the year and your 6th point about the wording.
Personally, I don't mind it when an occasional editor of an article writes in the past tense since they are unlikely to come back and edit it and it makes more work for regular editors of an article if they write in present tense. I also moved this sentence to the Initial themes section (since it is more appropriate) but the purpose of the Background section was never to be a section solely dedicated to events occurring prior to his inauguration. It's intended to provide background for the policy but isn't necessarily just the history prior to his inauguration since that would be better dealt with in the campaign and transition articles.
These are the thematic sections and the section titles can be changed as necessary. Other editors have also agreed about not being strict about the naming of the sections. The number of times Presidents visit foreign countries is significant and it is especially more significant when it highlights their attitude towards "hands-on" foreign policy and their relationship with their Secretary of State. I don't fault this user for trying to make a minor edit without understanding how to tie it in as you mention in your 4th point. We should leave that for more experienced editors and give an editor who has just joined the benefit of the doubt.
Your 5th point about the background section mistakes the purpose of the section. At present it may appear to be dealing with events leading up to January 20, 2009 but that is already addressed in other articles dealing with his campaign, transition, and inauguration and has nothing to do with this one. There is a reason that the Background and Initial themes sections are sub-sections of the History section and the history section has links to the campaign and Transition articles. At some point the History and Background sections may become their own sections but for the purpose of simplicity we should keep them as is but we have not had time to write a History section that ties in the campaign, transition, inauguration and his foreign policy throughout his administration. That is a daunting task but one that can be more easily achieved if we don't remove contributions that are made in good faith.
You are correct that this wouldn't belong in the biography article but it is appropriate in this article and can be tied into the rest of the article with a a little editing on our part. If you think it violates WP:COPY, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:RECENTISM, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NOTE, and WP:TRIVIA then feel free to edit it but sooner or later we are going to have to add it back in so it is pointless to remove it since this has a lot to do with his foreign policy outlook, policy and how he sees the role of the President, Secretary of State, Special Envoy's and others in foreign policy and diplomacy. Edward Lalone | (Talk)

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Edwardlalone! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 945 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Brent H. Goodfellow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Fred J. Fife - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Stephen H. Urquhart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Brad Dee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Patricia W. Jones - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Sheldon Killpack - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Gordon Snow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. David Clark (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Ronda Rudd Menlove - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:John s fullmer.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:John s fullmer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Public Policy Initiative and Online Ambassadors program edit

Hi! I noticed some of your work as I was recategorizing some foreign policy articles, and saw that you're also a member of the welcoming committee. You might be interested in the Public Policy Initiative that's starting up, and the associated Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy, as well as the related Online Ambassadors program. Cheers! --Sage Ross - Online Faciliator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject United States edit

 

Hello, Edwardlalone! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Wayne L. Niederhauser for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne L. Niederhauser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne L. Niederhauser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Michael WhiteT·C 21:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlene M. Walker edit

 

The article Carlene M. Walker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. » Shadowowl | talk 23:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Utahcounties.gif edit

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Utahcounties.gif edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Utahcounties.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 01:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Utahcounties.gif edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Utahcounties.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting edit

 

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

US Mountain West online meeting November 14 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply