User talk:Edward321/Archive 5

about warnings

You can report to WP:AIV after a final warning. MythSearcher^talk 08:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Ziya Songülen

Here this is the Link of Turkish...you can see his Mothers family was from Saliha Sultana the daughter of Mahmud II. So he is Noble.

http://koskorcuk.wordpress.com/2011/01/12/fenerbahce-kurucusu-ziya-nurizade-songulen%E2%80%99in-hayatindan-kesitler/

Dilek2 (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:AE

Take Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions which applies to Wikipedia:General_sanctions "Topics relating to Eastern Europe broadly construed" to WP:AE. The post on WP:AE needs to be structured to show the user conduct problem. The basis is disruption caused by I don't hear that behaviour in relation to article sourcing. Your diffs need to show the conduct, the warnings, and most importantly the constant IDHT behaviour over multiple noticeboards. You need to show attempts to address the conduct in edit summaries, on the talk pages of articles, and on relevant community areas, such as WP:IRS. Diffs will be required. And remember it is the IDHT behaviour that is the problem, and the conduct issue. Fifelfoo (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Yakub Alemsah

Yakub Alemsah is not sourced as a prince...he isnt a prince... I look this so called sources there in turkish and Englisch and they is abosutly not of talking this person. Please look too...You will not see his Name of any so called Sources... He is not a Member of the Ottoman Dynasty.

Dilek2 (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Reply

YOU must look it what you do you...ok?

Dilek2 (talk) 02:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Oghuz Han

Please go to:

http://www.igenea.com/en/index.php?c=40&adwords=godede_s_jude&gclid=CIj4yqz7jLECFUFG3wodgVpt-w

YOu will find the Testresult of Male descendants of the Oghuz Han trough Amuca Tribe.

Dilek2 (talk) 16:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing

I have given reference for every statement so please remove this {{multiple issues|BLP sources=July 2012|COI=July 2012|POV=July 2012|advert=July 2012|notability=July 2012|peacock=July 2012|self-published=July 2012}} from Devita Saraf wiki page.Shravanshetty502 (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

hi Edward i have given some reference. How can i show PDF file as a reference for Devita Saraf Shravanshetty502 (talk) 08:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

What is the URL (web address) of the PDF you are trying to source? Anyone can help you if you place a helpme request. Floating Boat (the editor formerly known as AndieM) 08:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I have converted the jpg into PDF and second thing i have given Reference for all the Statements so Edward plz remove {{multiple issues|BLP sources=July 2012|COI=July 2012|POV=July 2012|advert=July 2012|notability=July 2012|peacock=July 2012|self-published=July 2012}} or tell the processor what should i do name of the page Devita Saraf Shravanshetty502 (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

I would love have a coffee with you Shravanshetty502 (talk) 05:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Not only for reverting vandalism, but especially for reverting good faith edits that don't improve articles. <span style="font-size:small"Lova Falk talk 09:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigotry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Age and Race (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Editing of anime in American distribution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Origins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

HamzaMP

Do you think the IP is the same?

On another issue, are you aware that since Tamsier was blocked (and says he's retired) I've been trying to clean up some of the badly sourced and pov articles he's written? Dougweller (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Replied at my talk page but forgot to say I blocked HamzaMP for 24 hours for vandalism. Dougweller (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Need an Expert Advice on a Template.

Hi, Edward i have recently created a template Wives of Muhammad.Its is a navbox and the problem is that i want it to be un-collapsed for a specific group only. Like for example on the page of Khadija bint Khuwaylid i want the navhead for Khadija bint Khuwaylid only to be uncollapsed and rest to be collapsed and so on for other articles on Wives of Muhammad. Hope you can solve the problem and if it is not clear you can ask me on my talk page... Thanks in advance. Ibrahim ebi 13:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West of Thunder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stanier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Block

Do not understand the reason.

I have no other account than mine, Perihan S

I have not changed any Page.

Independent Macedonia

Hi Edward. How are you? I think you'll be interested in these edits.Best--MacedonianBoy (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Advert

Hi Edward, can you please help us? We are having trouble understanding what else to fix on this site: [1]. Thank you and best, Stillknight (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)stillknight

The article reads like a resume, not an encyclopedia article. So far you have done nothing to fix this, you have merely removed the tags. Edward321 (talk) 14:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay, we will work on this as soon as possible. Thank you and please let us know if in the revised version there is anything specific that is not correct. Best, Stillknight (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)stillknight

Hi Edward, I noticed you made fixes while we were editing. Please let us know if this now meets your standards. Initially, we used the template from here [2], which is why it may have read like a resume. Thank you and let us know if we should continue to edit or if we can remove the tags now? Best, Stillknight (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)stillknight

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Ottoman Grand Viziers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Abusing multiple accounts

Hi. I came across Phoenix2535 (talk · contribs) and noticed that he's making alot of destructive anti-Afghanistan edits, especially replacing valid Afghanistan history template with the incorrect History of Iran template to non-Iranian empires and kings who were born and died in what is today Afghanistan.... naturally they are a part of the history of Afghanistan but he strangely believes they belong to Iran (i.e. Ghaznavids). In fact, Phoenix2535 is Lysozym (talk · contribs) (also known as Tajik (talk · contribs)) who does too much POV-pushing [3] [4] and constantly makes controversial edits that often lead to edit-wars. I know him at the German Wikipedia, he also used a very similar sock (Phoenix2) which got blocked indefinately [5] [6].--39.41.138.206 (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Latin America Independence and Viceroyalties

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Here --Santos30 (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

GuitarGeek: Reliable Source

Hello. What is going on with all the rv spam undos to the guitargeek.com guitar rig references? GuitarGeek.Com easily passes WP:RS. The founder of GuitarGeek.Com, Adam Cooper, contributed to GuitarWorld's Vulgar Display of Power Section for 10 years and has interviewed hundreds of famous players regarding their gear. Rig info is from actual interviews with the guitarists and/or their techs. GuitarGeek has been online since 1995 and Adam has deep ties with the music industry and is a credible source. His rig diagrams have appeared in GuitarPlayer, Total Guitar UK, Guitarist, Alternative Press, History of Marshall Amplifiers, Roland/Boss User Guides, Ibanez Steve Vai Jemini & Paul Gilbert Airplane Flanger Instruction Manuals. He has interviewed everyone from Slash to Kirk Hammett to Def Leppard. Jetpack66 (talk) 02:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Józef Unrug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Branicki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

About Zardari's Sect

In Benazir Bhutto's book "Daughter of Destiny: An Autobiography"(January 1990).On page 30-31, She(Benazir) stated that his husband(Asif Ali Zardari) and family members belongs to Sunni sect. And in Image1 and Image2 he is praying behind Sunni Imam in Sunni style. Do not specify Zardari's sect or atleast donot give wrong information about his sect. SpidErxD (talk) 05:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Province of Tierra Firme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Andalusia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Why are you blanking this page

Why are you blanking the page "Shi'a view of the Sahaba"?? .SpidErxD (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

As I had already noted, it works better as a redirect to Sahaba. Edward321 (talk) 01:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

In many articles Shias are cursed because they hate some Sahaba, this artile "Shi'a view of the Sahaba" tells the reason why they hate Some Sahaba. So donot blank this page.SpidErxD (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Shia views are already listed on Sahaba. You have turned Shi'a view of the Sahaba from a redirect to a massive list of names, with no sources for it. Edward321 (talk) 01:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I will mention sources soon.SpidErxD (talk) 14:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I see that SpidErxD has created a page from this redirect. However, the decision to make the page a redirect was not taken at an WP:AFD discussion. If you think that the page should go back to being a redirect, I recommend that you propose it at WP:AFD. That way there will be a proper discussion of it.--Toddy1 (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Tabari citation about the Battle of Karbala casualties

Either next week or the week after I will try to check Tabari volume 19 to see whether it really mentions this figure of 78. I hope the index is useful, as I do not have time to read the book from cover to cover in search of 78.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

About AbuTalib faith

Shia believes that AbuTalib was Muslim and they gave the reason why they believe that.If you think Abu Talib was Kafir then provide reasons in Sunni view of Abu Talib instead of removing reasons from Shia view of AbuTalib.Thank you. SpidErxD (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia guidelines on original research and reliable sources. You have offered no sources, just your personal opinion of what Shia views are. Edward321 (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

It was not my personal interpretation. I mentioned 4(3shia+1sunni) sources of interpretation of ayat6 of surah93.Almost all interpretations said that this ayah was about AbuTalib.SpidErxD (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Shiite view of the Sahaba

It is not 100% unsourced, some of it is sourced and some is not. Better to discuss and find sources, than to completely wipe the page. The Sahaba page, if it were to house both Sunni and Shiite opinion, would be too large, and too biased, since the Shiite view does not represent mainstream Islam, so we cannot give both the same weight. Unflavoured (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Ghaznavid Empire

Hello. How did you decide to be a better version? Ghaznavid is undisputed Turk. Ghaznavid Persian mean is Persian propaganda! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMr KnG (talk • contribs) 16:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

List of casualties in Hussain's army at the Battle of Karbala

A discussion has been started at Talk:List of casualties in Hussain's army at the Battle of Karbala#Who should be listed that you may be interested in.--Toddy1 (talk) 21:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#Arabia

Greetings! Since you have previously edited Arabia, you might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#Arabia. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Edward321; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

langahs

just wanted to ask why wud you revert the langahs article to one which doesnt even follow the reference that some body who wrote it gavei.e the glossary of tribes one .. why dont you read it first and then undo it .. I know langahs because i have relatives who are langah from multan .. Thankyou i would appreciate if you could read the particular area in the article properly and then edit it rather than posting wrong info — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Why do you undo all the right changes..why dont you just read the references first and then change the articles instead of undoing the things that are correct

Hi Edward. i have been checking on some references on various articles but for some reason refernces are providing different info as compared to that of the info on the article. i have seen that you undo every minor change that is correct ..turkic mamluk origin of khwarzamina dynasty is a well known and proven fact on the wikipedia main article with loads of sources . Why are you reverting it back to tajik origin when there is one refernce which doesnt even open. i would really appreciate if you could read the refernces first and then edit whatever seems to be appropriate to edit. thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Muhammad Al Mahdi

Would you mind explaining why you reverted what I added in that article? The book is written by a Princeton professor. How much more reliable do you want it be?--Kazemita1 (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Mentalist

It described him as his nemesis which is mostly the same thing. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 23:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Well. No need to worry. I fixed that. Although I still feel that is usually another definition of archenemy a lot of times. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 12:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fuzzy-Wuzzy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahdist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Kumayl ibn Ziyad

Hi,

I just want to know why you reverted three edits on Kumayl ibn Ziyad.

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asadullah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

West Azerbaijan Province‎

In your recent edit to West Azerbaijan Province‎ what was the phrase when the region of Persarmnia supposed to modify? --Bejnar (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sadie Kaye may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{issues|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Thirty-Six Stratagems

The sources for the examples are listed on the page. Why do you consider that Original Reasearch? 174.22.12.114 (talk) 13:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

issue tages

Hello, we don't understand why you keep tagging this page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cristina_Patwa&veaction=edit

76.91.79.33 (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Everything is practically taken out and fully sourced with articles that have been released and supported. Please advise. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.79.33 (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Keith Wann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Wann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Wann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 16:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

John Zeleznik

Hi, Edward321. In the AFD for John Zeleznik, you mentioned that he is discussed in Science Fiction, Fantasy, & Horror:1991 : A Comprehensive Bibliography of Books and Short Fiction Published in the English Language and has artbooks published by three different publishers. Would you be able to add any of that to User:BOZ/John Zeleznik? BOZ (talk) 23:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Zhu Qissa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Ali ibn Abi Talib]], [[Talha ibn Ubaidullah]] and [[Zubair ibn al-Awam]], were each appointed as commander of one-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry B. Carrington may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• hearsay and unreliable information generally more valuable for political than military uses.{{cn}}} Carrington subsequently rejoined his old regiment in the [[Army of the Cumberland]], and completed

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Removing tags

Hello, we keep getting the tags for this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristina_Patwa We do not understand how this is written like an advertisement? It is now barely down to a few sentences. For the notability guidelines, we just added another source from the LA Times. What does it mean that this relies on sources too closely associated to the subject? The citations from multiple sources are included. Thanks.

I have removed the tags, as I feel the issues have been fixed. Edward, feel free to post on my talk or email me if you feel differently, but please don't blindly revert. Thanks, --Mdann52talk to me! 15:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you both for helping. For the notability component, we just cited a source that is not a passing mention and is not a press release. That reference can be found here: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-fi-ct-factorymade-20130910,0,1723531,full.story

Also, we do not understand what this other issue means "may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject," because all of the sources cited are from various publications. Thank you.

(talk page stalker) Who is "we"? Regarding your question, the sources that would be considered too closely associated with the subject are her and her business partners' press releases. Those are written by her or her allies without any independent editorial oversight. Huon (talk) 01:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

this link is cited and is not a press release nor was it written by the company or its allies: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-fi-ct-factorymade-20130910,0,1723531,full.story. Can you advise why these are still issues? Thanks all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.79.33 (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Because the sum total of that article's biographic coverage is Patwa...32...makes key decisions. Dru of Id (talk) 14:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Can you please explain the issues that are tagged and how these links do not resolve it? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.38.59.170 (talk • contribs) 2013-09-14T08:54:21‎

The current article sources cited are not sufficiently far from its subject, for example, the Univision source is published right at the company website, sources 7 and 8 are not provided, and sources 1-3 are not processed (you linked them but didn't extract information). This leaves only 2 actively used third-party sources, sources 4 and 6. Consider looking for other coverage in sources that do not focus specifically on the subject, or are recognised as major sources in their area. Gryllida 03:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Shia Islam

You appear to be involved in an edit war on Shia Islam. Please stop, and discuss the matter with the other party (PJDF2367 (talk · contribs)), preferably at Talk:Shia Islam, so others can be involved in the discussion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)