Welcome!

Hello, EdouardGris, and welcome to Wikipedia! This is one of the most popular websites in the world, and it's only through the contributions of editors like you. And Wikipedia is not just a collection of articles, it's an active community. The real fun here is contributing to Wikipedia, but don't feel hurt if some of your first few edits get removed, as there are some central guidelines you may not be familiar with.

Some good advice: be bold in your editing, and use the talk pages to discuss with other editors. Be kind to others, because there's a lot you can learn from them, and there's lots they can help you with.

There's lots of resources to help you become a great editor, from our basic introduction to our in-depth manual. But if you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. And if you haven't done so, tell us a bit about yourself. If you need some help, visit the Teahouse Q&A board. Oh, and please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

Glad you're here! Libby norman (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Sheldon Ross (March 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! EdouardGris, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

{{OTRS pending}} EdouardGris (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, OTRS has been confirmed today. Could you please validate the release of the text in the open? Thank you EdouardGris (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.

Hello, OTRS has been granted today. Could you please indicate if something else is needed to allow the release of the page? Thank you EdouardGris (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, OTRS was granted a few weeks ago. I am keen to get the article published. Could you please indicate if something else is needed to allow the release of the page? Thank you EdouardGris (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, still awaiting directions about the release of 'Mark Sheldon Ross' page, for which OTRS has been granted. What's the next step? Is it upon me or you? Thanks EdouardGris (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Mark Sheldon Ross edit

  Hello, EdouardGris! I'm APerson. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Mark Sheldon Ross.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross. APerson (talk!) 20:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

About getting help for something edit

While placing the Articles for Creation help desk notice on your talk page, I noticed that you had asked a few times about what to do now that the OTRS ticket had went through. Next time, you may want to use the {{Help me}} template to ask for help; it's highly likely that you will get a quick response after you put it on your talk page. Happy editing! APerson (talk!) 20:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you APerson helping me navigate in wikiworld... Still very new to me, and missing the basics. 21:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.176.250 (talk)

Mark Sheldon Ross edit

Hi EdouardGris, thanks for your note on my talk page. I noticed that you have lost the history of the article so that the next reviewer won't be aware of the article's past review. I'm a volunteer who reviews lots of pages, so the only way I could refresh my memory about the history of the page was by checking your talk page. Don't worry too much as there is a lot to learn on Wikipedia, but for future reference it is not recommended to remove editor reviews during the Afc process since it's very helpful to have the history of a page kept in one place. In terms of the OTRS, well done for getting this sorted out. While this is helpful, you may find that the page does not pass Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines as it is somewhat promotional of the subject in tone. You may also wish to improve the structure with headings and Wikilinks to – for instance – Tracy Emin. I won't be re-reviewing as I prefer not to return to articles I've previously looked at. There is a backlog elimination drive starting today, so lots of reviewers are working hard to get through articles in the queue and hopefully you won't have to wait too long for someone to provide feedback. Hope that helps, and thanks again for getting in touch. Libby norman (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Libby, sorry but I had not realised that editor reviews had been removed... Are there any schematics to assist with process of editing, and understanding the various building blocks within Wikipedia arcana? As for the text itself, the initial draft has a lot fo wikilinks built in, such as to T Emin, but they got lost in the way. Not sure about your assessment that the text has a promotional element to it, since it is fact based (there is no qualitative description). Will look at the draft further. I assume that the text where it is, is in the right review queue, and that I do not need to move it around. All best with your backlog campaign. 86.178.176.250 (talk) 16:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry at all – there are a lot of things to digest on Wikipedia! Hope you don't mind but I've put a welcome message at the top of the page; this has some useful links to give you more background info on writing, editing other people's pages and so on. Main guidance I can give is to keep going and don't be afraid to ask for help when you get stuck. Best wishes. Libby norman (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Sheldon Ross (June 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross edit

 

Hello EdouardGris. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mark Sheldon Ross".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 17:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply