Welcome!

Hello, Edecker@nwlink.com, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Caution about conflict of interest edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ed Decker, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. __meco (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Ed Decker. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Edecker@nwlink.com. You have new messages at Talk:Ed Decker.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
If you have not already, please visit the above pages. The pages on Wikipedia that relate to the relevant policy are linked there with an explanation of how you can address the concerns raised. Cheers, S.G.(GH) ping! 19:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

My apologies edit

I saw that your account was old enough to be grandfathered regarding the username policy disallowing usernames that are email addresses, and instead of closing the page like I intended - I accidentally applied a soft block on you briefly. I've of course removed the block immediately after it was applied, but I wanted to let you know and apologize for the idiot move on my part :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Please help me with... THis is the real Ed Decker. I just happened to skim through my "content" and except for it being vile and evilly posted in many instances, It is almost laughable.carving 666 in their wrists?? Follow your disclaimer: Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. I want to write a correction. Some of what you share is very true. But the comments by my ex-wife are rift with lies.

This post needs serious correction. I am 86 years old now and would love to have wikipedia print the truth about me. I use Wikipedia often and usually trust it,[I do send a few dollar now and then]

Ed Decker

(Redacted)

Edecker@nwlink.com (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Edecker@nwlink.com (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Contact OTRS. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 23:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply