Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiwi Farms (January 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Eclipseofthemoon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Redirect for creation edit

  Redirect created. You can find it at The Onion Routing Project. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! --JohnnyFiveHole (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. SeraphWiki (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

It certainly was not an attack page (read WP:ATP please), and your speedy deletion request was speedily denied, rightfully so by User:Vejvančický. By the way, this is a draft under the WP:Articles for Creation process. I don't know what you prerogative is because you rudely attempted speedy deletion with no explanation whatsoever, but I politely request an explanation and an apology, or I will seek further administrative help and consider this a case of you not assuming good faith and biting the newbie. --Eclipseofthemoon (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The sourcing for the negative statements in the article is inadequate for these types of negative statements and when I looked it over carefully I didn't see much in the draft that could be salvaged, I think this qualifies under WP:ATP.SeraphWiki (talk) 21:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
You are invited to join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Draft:Kiwi_Farms SeraphWiki (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The burden of proof is on YOU to prove that it is a WP:ATP. You can't just say "I still think it's an ATP." I can't help but notice you have a demonstrable history of trying and failing to get articles speedily deleted without going through proper procedure. --Eclipseofthemoon (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Previous edit

Admins, email me for backstory which includes non-public information. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Eclipseofthemoon (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20250 was submitted on Jan 07, 2018 03:50:57. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Eclipseofthemoon (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20320 was submitted on Jan 14, 2018 03:12:17. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 03:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply