Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DualHelix (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is what I write and state that I will make no more user accounts.I want to regain this account and want to assume good faith :)....My aim is to be a Steward later :).Pl consider and unblock me, Thanks, DH
;-) By 127.0.0.1 ( Report ) [ Evidence | Block ] On :: 10:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

There are enough accounts here (as noted and   Confirmed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RRaunak) to cause serious concern. Your request doesn't discuss why the block was in error, or what mitigating factors exist that would cause it to be lifted. You need to have a look at WP:GAB before filing another request. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock? Why? edit

Give a good reason why you should be unblocked . You created multiple accounts even after being warned. Your edits do not have anything of substance. After you were blocked you resorted to vandalising the user pages and talk pages of those editors who were involved in getting you to book. Worst of all you vandalised Tinucherian's user page despite the fact that he had tried his best to help you out and had nothing to do with the Checkuser cases against you. And going by your habits it is not improbable to beleive that you may have created more socks after being blocked. It will be too difficult to Assume good faith with you. --Deepak D'Souza (talkcontribs) 13:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  1. Oppose I strongly oppose to your unblock proposal. You wikistalked me, you dug up my past (wich i don't do anymore), you vandalized some highly visible templates that i created. You broke the Wikipedia rules many times and i won't allow you to get unblocked. --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!Talk 17:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
And getting the Steward flag is to be directly connected to the Wikimedia foundation. It's a even harder process to get that status. --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!Talk 17:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply