Draco97

Draco97, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Draco97! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Tasek Gelugor railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tasek Gelugor railway station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published as it is not shown to meet WP:GEOFEAT. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Kobah railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kobah railway station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to show it meets WP:GEOFEAT. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KTM West Coast railway line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jasin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Draco97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Draco97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tasek Gelugor railway station

Hello, Draco97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tasek Gelugor railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kobah railway station concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kobah railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kobah railway station has been accepted

Kobah railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Same style for Putrajaya and Kajang Line

Hello there. I'm messaging you to inquire if there is a way to apply the same style for the name section of the LRT lines (the background colours, i.e. pink for KJ, brown for SP, etc) for Kajang and Putrajaya lines. I hope you could help. Thanks. FikkuFiq 23:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I am not sure who created the infobox style template but it currently allows the background colour formatting for Prasarana owned lines only, i.e. Ampang, Sri Petaling, Kelana Jaya, Shah Alam, Monorail and the BRT. It follows the signage format in all RapidKL stations. The MRT lines have a different signage format (also different company) in their stations, probably that is why they don't have the same style infobox like the LRT stations. The current way it is displayed matches the signage in the stations. Draco97 (talk) 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Now that you said it, I also realized that's kinda true 🤣. FikkuFiq 23:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Haha yes. I wish there was conformity. I wish everything was the same. Would look so much better tbh. But thank you for asking! Draco97 (talk) 05:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

KLRT route diagrams

1. STOP changing the V•T•E links! The |navbar= parameter has to have the name of the template, otherwise an error occurs.
2. Stations that do not exist (yet) cannot be "provisional". (I realize that English may not be your primary language.)
3. Italics are not used for anything other than connecting lines: see WP:Route diagram template/MOS#Text.

Thank you for your cooperation. Useddenim (talk) 14:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Also, please read MOS:HYPHEN and MOS:DASH for the correct use of "-" and "–". Useddenim (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

1. Was unaware of this. I am trying to make sure there is standardisation and conformity across all articles and templates related to rail transport in Malaysia which is seriously lacking, I misunderstood what this parameter meant.

2. Like I said, I am making sure there is proper standardistation and conformity across all articles because it gets confusing when there are too many terms being used. The word "provisional" has been used across all the articles as well as on news sites when talking about the stations that have yet to be built. And fyi, English is my native language.

3. Noted on this.

And to add on,

4. It would be helpful if you corrected the mistakes instead of undoing everything completely and removing the correct and useful edits.

Thank you for your hard work. Draco97 (talk) 03:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for any misunderstandings – I admit that I am not all that knowledgeable about that part of the world.

I was relying on the Wiktionary definition of "provisional"; is there a local usage with a different meaning, or is it possibly a poor translation from Malay?

Also, it might be worthwhile to review the naming of all rail infrastructure in Malaysia – is there a style guide (akin to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK stations))? As an aside, Dicklyon was quite helpful when the naming of UK rail lines was rationalized about five years ago. And I will attempt to be more judicious with my edits going forward. Useddenim (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)