Welcome! edit

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦β™₯♣♠♦


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Docterwhocupcake (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I know I've done the wrong thing, but I really did not know that the websites that I linked to weren't allowed. They're not even my websites. I just like them and I would be very pleased being unblocked. I truly didn't know so can you please help me. I feel like I was blocked for nothing, yet I do know that I have. I'm sure being unblocked will mean I will not do anything wrong. I promise I am here to build an encyclopedia. I just did not understand prior of writing this. (also I can not make this any further down)

Please consider all I have said (written?) and unblock me.

Yours sincerely, Docterwhocupcake (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Docterwhocupcake (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I have considered all you have written, and none of it was improving the encyclopedia. If you genuinely thought this was an improvement of our article on meat, I have to doubt your competence. Huon (talk) 00:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Emojis are awesome edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emojis are awesome, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 211.100.57.174 (talk) 00:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kizi.com edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kizi.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β Β SandsteinΒ  06:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Docterwhocupcake (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi. I didn't know putting kizi on my profile (or anywhere) was against the rules. Now that I know, I shall not do it again. I understand why I am blocked, now that I think about it. I want wikipedia to be a good encyclopedia. It would be very good if you could unblock me. Thank you. Yours truly,Docterwhocupcake (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Docterwhocupcake. Docterwhocupcake (talk) 03:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That's certainly not the only reason. None of your edits have been constructive.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How does X work? edit

I never get any of my articles published. Am I writing the articles wrong or what?. Docterwhocupcake (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the article content from your talk page. It is non conforming with WP:user page.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Nothing you post will be accepted until you are unblocked. Your access to this page is provided so that you can appeal the block; if you persist in using this page for other purposes, that access will be removed. YunshuiΒ ι›²ζ°΄ 09:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply