Dkephart

Orphaned non-free media (File:LSIlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:LSIlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Dkephart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! illogicalpie(eat me) 21:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dkephart! I am Illogicalpie and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

illogicalpie(eat me) 21:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, illogicalpie. Without claiming anything other than a sincere interest in getting a few things out, where all the folks who ask what is that? can read about them...I do confess the potential conflict of interest on my page. Also, I would very much appreciate it if you could point out anywhere you think that potential becomes realized in any of my edits or articles. Soooo... without further ado, I declare: Dkephart (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Link-Systems International, Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Link-Systems International, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MyAcademicWorkshop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MyAcademicWorkshop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Request for help

Hi. Your request for help has been noted by an administrator. Could you please state exactly what you need help with. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

I saw the note earlier. He was asking if his/her personal knowledge or involvement was showing up in the his/her editing. I think I can answer to that end. Dkephart, it's obvious you have a lot of expertise in this area, and it shows in your writing. That's both good and bad. It's good because you hit on the most salient issues relating to the field. It's bad, because your writing sounds like an expert not an encyclopedia. There's a subtle difference there, but it generally comes down to encyclopedias having no voice of their own. They don't know the answers, they just report on them. When I read your writing I know that an expert wrote it, because the writing carries your personal voice, or at least an expert's personal voice. Instead, try in write more to summarize than to inform. They're subtly different, but the 'informing' style conveys that the encyclopedia writer has some personal mission, that they want the reader to understand. It's just slightly too involved and slightly too pro-understanding. That might sound like a bit oxymoronic--encyclopedias are supposed to inform. But they're supposed to inform everyone equally about every topic, as if they are all of equal importance and all of equal noteworthiness.

One tactic is to be more deliberate your summation. Rather than describing in detail all of the current issues, look for a secondary source that has already done so and paraphrase its overview. This will help you avoid doing the summarizing yourself, and injecting some of your perspective. You don't come across as biased, just slightly involved (which you are!). Encyclopedias can be written by experts, and it helps to have knowledgeable contributors, but we want it to sound somewhat homogenous without being boring. That's an attempt at an explanation; it's not complete and not without some holes (good encyclopedias might benefit from a bit of variety and a hint of familiarity at times), but I suspect that's not the issue here.

Also, I removed the link to NetTutor as a reference. We can't use the site itself as proof of certain platforms adopting a technology. To show that this adoption was notable, we have to have another reliable source report on the site. There are tags on the articles you wrote now to give some notice to other editors about what might be fixed.

Do you have any thoughts? Ocaasi ^c 06:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Link-Systems International has been accepted

Link-Systems International, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ABCDEFAD_✉ 20:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)