Hello, Disordered.information, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 


You want to take a look at No Original Research. -Enric Naval (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

RE: No original research existed. I used some difficult to attribute language and failed to cite my application of simple physical principles. The intention was to have the entire section deleted. It appears you, instead, reverted my changes by deleting the entire edit and then included a source to a previously uncited nonsensical statement which is not attributable to the author cited. I removed the entire section as should have been done previously. Disordered.information (talk) 02:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I replied in User_talk:Enric_Naval#Creditably_of_Wiki. --Enric Naval (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply