Academic Doping Page Project edit

Here's what my group thinks the article needs to meet the Good article criteria:


1. Well-written

2. Verifiable with no original research

3. Broad in coverage

4. Neutral

5. Stable (n/a)

6. Illustrated


DinzdalePR, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi DinzdalePR! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Username edit

Hi. I am a random fleeting admin with some pre-emptive advice. You are welcome to a welcome template. I'll spare you the room and informality, and just link to it since it contains some useful links. I noticed your username. My first thought was, here's another public relations person at work on promoting something here. He's going to get reported to admins such as myself and get blocked with little ado. It may be that you work in PR and are happy to avoid conflicts of interest and so on. It may just be that the PR just represents some other initials. It may be that you are here on a mission. I can't entirely tell from your contributions. At this point I point you to the WP:COI and WP:CORPNAME pages, and suggest that if your intentions are entirely innocent, this is made clear on your userpage. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

For your own good, thank you very much. This place can be a bit brutal for beginners. Just shout if you need any help. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply