Dining philosopher

Blanking at Andhra Pradesh

I have reverted your edits on the article. If you feel the language needs to be improved, please improve it. Blanking I feel is not the solution. - Ganeshk (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

WTF??? Why dont you write the article in Telugu? For god's sake, learn english before you attempt to author wiki articles!!! Whats the point in putting unintelligible gibberish on Wiki? -DP

Please refrain from blanking properly cited information, and also references from reliable sources. Thank you. --Ragib 19:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, regarding this, this, and this edit, Please deal with other contributions in a polite and constructive manner. Rude behavior is discouraged by Wikipedia policies. See Wikipedia:Civility. Thank you.. --Ragib 19:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The citation was irrelevant. And could you kindly tell me why you removed the "Objective" from the article? Thanks. -DP

The citation was definitely relevant. Please refer to wikipedia's policies on having only verifiable information. Self-published websites of organizations are not considered reliable sources. Cut/pasting information from other websites in an unencyclopedic manner is not welcome in Wikipedia. The article is about the organization, not a manifesto of the organization. Thank you. --Ragib 19:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your final warning. The next time you paste copyrighted information, and also blank citations, you will be blocked from editing. Your incivil comments as mentioned above are already grounds for blocking. Thanks. --Ragib 19:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The citation has nothing to do with Students Islamic Organization of INDIA. Maybe you dont know how and when to use references. If you do, perhaps you could tell me what Students Islamic Organization of INDIA has to do with "The Muslim World After 9/11. By Angel M Rabasa, Cheryl Benard, Peter Chalk, C Christine Fair, Theodore Karasik, Rollie Lal, Ian Lasser, Ian O Lesser, David E Thaler, Rand Corporation, ISBN 0833037129. Published January 2005." While you are at it, could you also tell me why a BANGLADESHI like you should be interested in Students Islamic Organization of INDIA?

That's the only reliable source which could be found about the organisation. Perhaps if you looked it up, you might have insights as to how the reference is related. More sources are always welcome. You might look into referebce guidelines and reliable source guidelines to understand about the wikipedia verfiability criteria. I understand that you are a new editor, and may not know wikipedia's verifiability process, feel free to contact me if you need any help.

As for why I'm interested, nobody went ahead and put a tag on articles which can't be edited by people from particular countries. Thanks. --Ragib 20:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Ragib 20:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

"The Muslim World After 9/11..." has nothing to do with SIO. If there is a connection, it is a very feeble one and does not justify the reference. I dont see how criticism of an administrator's judgement can be contrued as "personal attack." --DP

You've now been blocked for 24 hours for rampant personal attacks, blanking, and copyright violations. Take this time to cool off and familiarize yourself with wikipedia's regulations, because if you continue this after your block expires, you will simply be blocked again for longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InShaneee (talk • contribs)

This is blatant discrimination and gang behavior. I am lodging an official complaint against the administrators involved. - DP

This is you violating WP:NPA. It's set in stone, and all users are required to follow it. If you cannot treat all other users with respect, I suggest you find another site to invest your time in. And by administrator, you mean me. The guy who WILL be blocking you for longer if you make one more racist comment. --InShaneee 20:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I have sent the following complaint to wiki: Please take a look at the history of the following page and decide for yourself whether the blocking is warranted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dining_philosopher#Blanking_at_.5B.5BAndhra_Pradesh.5D.5D I am blocked from editing by InShaneee (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:InShaneee) who is probably acting in collusion with Ragib (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ragib).

The reasons given were the following: personal attacks, vandalism, ect

Will the administrator please explain what acts of personal attacks and vandalism I am guilty of. I believe that these administrators lack good judgement and dont deserve their priviliges. Blocking is a weapon that is too powerful to be put into the hands of such juveniles (sorry but thats the truth).

Could you kindly tell me what are the racist comments I made? Also, please take a look at the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship which clearly states that "Administrators must be courteous, and exercise good judgment and patience in dealing with others." Clearly, this is a power trip for you and "And by administrator, you mean me. The guy who WILL be blocking you for longer ...." is far from "courteous, and exercise good judgment and patience" especially while dealing with a novice.

Just because you're blocked doesn't mean you can't be blocked for longer, which will happen if you post another attack-filled tirade such as the one above. --InShaneee 21:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Some Links: http://www.aetherometry.com/antiwikipedia/Section_I.html http://courseblog.cs.princeton.edu/spring06/wws528f/?p=68 http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060119-6013.html http://emacsmood.livejournal.com/101766.html http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/08/322087.html

Anybody who has attended a college should know that its perfectly allright to use material from others as long as you cite your sources. I have been blocked for no good reason by the above admins.

Wikipedia is not a scholarly journal, and we have our own policies. I've extended your block so you have plenty of time to read them, and I have removed the personal attacks you posted above as well as taking the liberty of ensuring you could not continue making them. --InShaneee 01:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)