Your Image edit

There has been an AN/I thread opened regarding your addition of this photograph into the 9/11 conspiracy theories article. Mr Which??? 01:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC) dear wikiuser there are more than 10 references that indicate 104 million for thriller, please cease your edit activities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.8.55.166 (talk) 00:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Arbitration Warning edit

Regarding these edits:

60 to 70 million edit

Regarding your change of 60 to 70 million in the WWII article.

May I ask for a specific explanation for the changing of this figure please? That number comes with a reference, are you saying the original person who put in the reference mis-transcribed the source? Thanks. CraigWyllie (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of wealthiest historical figures edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of wealthiest historical figures. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wealthiest historical figures (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply