Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message.

Welcome! edit

Hi, DietCokeIsTheBest. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hitro talk 20:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Help request edit

I want to create a new page Interstate 755 (Mississippi). I think it is important for Wikipedia. If you do some research see Interstate-Guide: Interstate 755 Mississippi. If you think it should created let me known. I just want permission first.

Welcome to Wikipedia. You don't need permission from anyone to create an article, but I suggest you ask advice at the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads which is a group of users interested in road articles. They probably have useful guidelines and could give you helpful advice. It would be worth reading WP:Your first article, too. Regards JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is this the Interstate you want to write about? If I understand that page correctly, that Interstate was in the planning stage six years ago, and it doesn't seem to have been built since, despite plans to complete it by 2013. I haven't been able to find any other sources. I rather don't think an abandoned project like that one is notable enough to be the subject of an encyclopedia article. You may want to ask the editors at the U.S. Roads WikiProject for more advice, though; they may even be able to help you find references.
On an entirely unrelated note, your username sounds as if you were adverticoke diet coke. Wikipedia does not permit promotional usernames, and you probably should request a username change at this page in order to avoid misunderstandings or even a block. Huon (talk) 21:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I-755 is also the Airport Parkway (Mississippi), and we don't need two articles on the same roadway. As for planned and canceled roads, they can be notable and worthy of inclusion. Sometimes when there isn't much to say, we might not give them a full article and just give them a section in another article or list. Sometimes there is a lot to be said, like with County Road 595 (Marquette County, Michigan), and they can get an article. Imzadi 1979  17:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

NEW=Decade Man REASON=I was told that DietCokeIsTheBest is like I am advertising diet coke

April 2015 edit

  Your addition to Interstate 570 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Imzadi 1979  16:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DietCokeIsTheBest, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi DietCokeIsTheBest!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DietCokeIsTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no idea whats going on. I just log on to my account and I was block for sock puppet for whatever that name is. I just join yesterday, and I been excused over something that I don`t know about. Who ever this Kinu guy is needs to get some evidence before he starts blocking people, that is foolishness. I don`t know who he think he is. This just made me mad i`m just trying to help the community. He should had talk to me first if he had a concerned, some kind of administrator that is. I have been enjoying my short time on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

CheckUser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DietCokeIsTheBest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am no part of a sock puppet. That Kinu guy need to leave people alone. I seen the accounts that he blocked and I have no apart of those accounts, so he needs to get the facts straight, and start to communicate. Such a fake administrator. Who in world elected him a as administrator. People on Wikipedia ignore him.

Decline reason:

If you make another spurious unblock request that does not address the reason for your block, your talk page access will be disabled. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just it was also necessary at the other sock accounts, I'm revoking talk page access to stop this waste of time. --Kinu t/c 19:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply