Dick@Dove
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for contributing. I hope you decide to stay.
I reverted your addition to Dove Foundation, because, as noted, the poll results are not reliable. If you would like to reword your suggestion into NPOV, such as by stating "Dove's published poll results show that...", and taking into account the noted flaws, then please feel free. Also, you are always welcome to make comments on the article's talk page, or on my own user talk page. Cheers, Vectro 17:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. Please do not persist in adding unqualified statements to the article Dove Foundation. It is considered vandalism. Wikipedia welcomes meaningful contributions, but articles must use a Neutral Point of View. If you wish to discuss this further, make comments on the article's talk page, or on my own user talk page. Vectro 20:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello Vectro. Your comment referring to my "unqualified statements" is ill-informed. I am the founder of The Dove Foundation. As such, I'm frustrated at seeing 15 years of hard work dissed by mischaracterizations from "experts" who post information without proper fact-checking. If, as you say, "Wikipedia welcomes meaningful contributions from a Neutral Point of View," then I'd like to keep the information balanced and accurate by making contributions from a neutral and informed point of view. I'm available to discuss this further. I'm always ready to discuss/debate my position, and would appreciate you not redirecting my submissions unless you can substantiate their inaccuracy. Regards, --Dick@Dove 02:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Dick@Dove
Hello! You've removed a recently added user warning template from your user or user talk page. This tends to give the impression that you didn't read it. User warning templates contain valuable information and although you may disagree, it's best if you consider them. Thank you. Vectro 06:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)