Diadia1450

Speedy deletion of Lizasearch.com

A tag has been placed on Lizasearch.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 16:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Cherkess (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cherkess (film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.natpress.net/stat_e.php?id=4184. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Cherkess

You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. For structure and ideas for layout have a look at any of the film Good Articles eg Dirty Dancing, although obviously you don't have to aim for that level, just enough to keep it on. You will need to bear the following in mind:

You cannot copy and paste text from copyright sources (anything that doesn't say it's free to reuse), write in your own words

You can only use pictures that are free to reuse, although the film poster can be used under a fair use licence - see File:Dirty Dancing.jpg

You will need to show that the film meets these criteria for notability, note that Imdb does not fulfil this, although it can be used as a source of information.

You will need to source your material, especially any claims about the success or excellence of the film to WP:RS sources, which would not include the film company's site or self-generated like Facebook

It mustn't be promotional in tone. If you include reviews from independent sources saying how good it is, also put in those saying it's rubbish.

Hope this helps Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)