Deckerling

Your recent contributions

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Infophile ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 04:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Final Draft

The main problem with this article was that it was written more like an advertisement than an article, eg

1. is considered the industry preferred software for writing for theatre, television and film. - no independent verifiable reference for this
2. Its Smart Type™ ... allowing writers to use tab-completion to speed up their writing. no independent verifiable reference, and even a TM symbol
3. Final Draft software is the only scriptwriting software with an authorized agreement with Writers Guild of America West (WGAw) online script registry. no independent verifiable reference
4. Features no sources for any of the claims, full of "you" and "your", i.e. written like an advert, not an encyclopaedia
5. claimed list of productions is unsourced
6. only source given for the article is the company website, not an independent verifiable sources. The only good point is that the reviews included a negative one. Basically, reference the claims properly or leave them out. Hope this helps

Jimfbleak (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)