Welcome! edit

Tip of the moment...
 
How to create a link to another article

Click on "Edit" at the top of an article. Then place double square brackets around the topic you want to link to.

For example: [[pear]]

produces the link pear

For the plural write this: [[pear]]s

which will look like this: pears

If you want to create a link to a section of an article (for example "Cultivation" of the "pear" article) place an internal hyperlink "Pear#Cultivation" separated by a vertical bar ( "|" ).

For example: [[Pear#Cultivation|cultivation of pears]]
which will look like this:

cultivation of pears
Read more:
Links
To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}

Hello, Debrafir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~Adjwilley (talk) 02:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you're creating a new article, so good luck with that. I was a little confused by your post here at the editor retention board. ~Adjwilley (talk) 02:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Debrafir, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi, thanks for your work on the Savannah Phillips article. Please see the invite above to the teahouse where you can get guidance on what needs doing to this article to get it up to scratch. Sourcing is especially important on this article as it is about a living person, so what's written needs to be right and supported by good quality sources (not blogs or Royal fan sites). The Teahouse is a good place to ask advice on article style and referencing- I posted an invitation above. Rankersbo (talk) 07:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Savannah Phillips (British royal family), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anne Delong (talk) 17:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to Savannah Phillips (British royal family) edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Technopat (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply