Speedy deletion of Daniel-Jake Roberts edit

 

A tag has been placed on Daniel-Jake Roberts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. A new name 2008 (talk) 21:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John (surname), did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bishop (surname). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Poitiers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Poitiers was changed by Deadbed (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-18T09:42:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Recreation. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Medal. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Skarebo (talk) 09:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Homo (genus). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


 
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru talk 12:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply