Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorgen Dreyer (June 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Dcj3616, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorgen Dreyer has been accepted

edit
 
Jorgen Dreyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jorgen Dreyer

edit

July 2015

edit

Thank you very much for your hundreds of improvements to my first article. I saw from the log you spent many hours doing this, and I genuinely appreciate all your improvements.

I have a few questions and I don't know if this is the place to do this, so correct this newbie if I am out of place.

I read in "Your first article" that date formats are largely the choice of the submitter, so I went with my preference of 13 September 1945. I notice you put dates in September 13, 1945 format. Is there a standard?

I intentionally referred the birth date to the draft card because some biographies show his birth date as 26 December 1878. I believe his birth date was 26 December 1877, and I based that on his handwritten entries on the draft card.

Another newbie question: How can I show newspaper clippings from an online source (like newspapers.com)? I chose to do this on my personal web site (http://dcjetc.com/UncleJorgen/clippings.htm), but maybe there is a way to do this within Wikipedia?

Again, thanks much for significant improvements to my first effort. Dcj3616 (talk) 14:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I did spend quite a lot of time on your article. It was my pleasure to improve it and add my own touches. "Uncle Jorgen" (who I assume was your relative) was a very fine sculptor so he certainly deserves the article to highlight his career accomplishments.
With regard to date format, that is entirely your choice. I also prefer d/m/y formatting for dates. As for the newspaper clippings, I think you are better off just gleaning useful information from newspaper clippings and then typing it into your article with a citation to the newspaper. As you gain experience on Wikipedia as a writer and editor, I feel certain you will agree with me on that. My experience is that even one odd or bad photo in an article can mar its appearance in a negative way. If you insist on showing a newspaper clipping in your article, the best way to display it is with an external link as I did with the draft card showing Dreyer's hand-written birthday.
Fantastic job on your first article! Keep up the good work. If you have any questions going forward, I will certainly try to assist if I can. While not an expert either, I do have a little more than a year of experience at this point so I know a few tricks. --Wapiti (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

First Article -- Jorgen Dreyer

edit

Thank you for your creation of the article on Jorgen Dreyer. I hereby award you your first editor ribbon, which you richly reserve for producing such a fine article on your first attempt at article production. Keep up the good work!
--Wapiti (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 This editor is a Novice Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.


Your submission at Articles for creation: George Trayser has been accepted

edit
 
George Trayser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse reply

edit
 
Hello, Dcj3616. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply