Welcome! edit

Hello, DayvonHole, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Ed6767 (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Ed6767 (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mindy Kaling, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Juliette Han (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mindy Kaling, you may be blocked from editing. Juliette Han (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate images, as you did at Mindy Kaling, you may be blocked from editing. See: WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT. Juliette Han (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism notification edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Juliette Han. Juliette Han (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Mindy Kaling shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Attention edit

For civility reasons, I strongly advise against leaving warning templates on user pages, such as mine, unless you are confident in Wikipedia's policies. Doing so is misleading and can frighten off new editors. In this case, simply leaving a message would've been a much better way of dispute resolution. See WP:UW for more info. Ed6767 (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply