The Texas Tenors edit

I have removed the image from this article as an unambiguous copyright violation. As discussed on the image's deletion discussion on Commons, its source page is clearly copyrighted. If you disagree, please discuss the issue on Commons. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

In your edit summary at Marcus Collins (actor), you state that we have permission to use this image. You will need to establish this through aregular channels. Please raise the issue at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Until then, the image clearly derives from a copyrighted source and cannot be used here. Again, if you disagree, please address the issue on the image's deletion discussion on Commons. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from The Texas Tenors. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Dawniniowa. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Texas Tenors, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.[1] - SummerPhD (talk) 02:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notability Guideline for Music edit

Criteria for musicians and ensembles-

A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, instrumentalist, etc.) may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria: Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. Dawniniowa (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Marcus Collins.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Marcus Collins.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201482738408708&set=a.1640877900169.86700.1183454251&type=3&theater. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While you have provided a claim that you own the image and are releasing it to the public domain, we need evidence that you do own the rights to the image. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Marcus Collins (actor) edit

Please note that the article is still up for deletion. There are still no independent reliable sources cited in the article. To prevent deletion, you will need to either provide such sources or discuss the issue at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Collins (actor). Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree files edit

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 23#OTRS pending since October. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply