Although I agree that the material you are editing in the section "Reports from Public Health Law Research" is absurd, but it's what they're saying. Unless you can provide a reliable source that the (obviously accurate) changes you are making are correct, they cannot stay. Didn't you notice that I attributed the entire section to that organization, and questioned whether it was appropriate? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)