David J Meager
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for transforming a stub into an informative article. You can format links using double sq brackets "[ [" then actual page name, then a vertical bar "|" then the wording you wish to use in the text, then close sq brackets. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking the edits would be better made by someone else with no daytime connection, but you've been above board and honest, and appear to be adding content in a neutral informative way, which is, as far as I can see, in line with general Wikipedia guidelines, so - speaking as the originator of the stub - I personally think it's all good content. If anyone has any concerns you could delete and I'd be quite willing to repost 99.9% the same as 3rd party edits. The only thing I would say is perhaps try and look for third party sources where possible. You may find WP:PSTS helpful. And also try searching on Google Scholar. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- I added a Talk Page to article (click Discussion tab) and entered this into the Anglicanism project (click relevant links on the new article Talk page. I also left a link on the Anglicanism project discussion page inviting other editors to review your/my work. You may wish to enroll as a member in that project and/or contribute to other articles as well. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice, I will try and find third party sources wherever possible and remove any unnecessary links to our website. Many thanks, David.
- Strictly speaking the edits would be better made by someone else with no daytime connection, but you've been above board and honest, and appear to be adding content in a neutral informative way, which is, as far as I can see, in line with general Wikipedia guidelines, so - speaking as the originator of the stub - I personally think it's all good content. If anyone has any concerns you could delete and I'd be quite willing to repost 99.9% the same as 3rd party edits. The only thing I would say is perhaps try and look for third party sources where possible. You may find WP:PSTS helpful. And also try searching on Google Scholar. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Photos
editThe photo of W. H. Griffith Thomas, and a postcard of a Church Association van do indeed seem very appropriate and okay to upload, (and now look good in loco). http://www.churchsociety.org/issues_new/history/griffiththomas/iss_history_griffiththomas_intro.asp http://www.churchsociety.org/aboutus/History/History.asp I don't see any need to go to the extra work of uploading on commons (which has tougher upload rules, but can then be accessed by foreign language wikipedias) but if you do need any help on uploading to commons instead of en.wiki let me know. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, David J Meager. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:W. H. Griffith Thomas.tif
edit
Thanks for uploading File:W. H. Griffith Thomas.tif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)