Welcome!
Hello, DavidBabsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mike Peel (talk) 22:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to suggest an amendment to the Cine City page.. edit
Hi, I'm David Babsky, who's mentioned in that article as an owner of Cine City.
(I've mentioned this in the Discussion page about that article, but there doesn't seem to have been any response to that.)
I'd like to suggest a factual amendment to the CC article; the last sentence of the 'history' section reads thus: "It was purchased by David Babsky, who kept the cinema open until July 2001, when it closed due to competition[3][10] from a new multiplex cinema in nearby East Didsbury.[7]" This is not quite true, and SHOULD read: "It was purchased by David Babsky, who kept the cinema open until July 2001, when it closed - reportedly due to competition[3][10] from a new multiplex cinema in nearby East Didsbury[7], but actually because Babsky's Mancunian parents had died in '97 and '99 and, having no further reason to remain in Manchester, he sold it and returned to London."
The first sentence of the next 'Closure and redevelopment' section should read, to be factually accurate: "Just prior to the cinema's closure, it was purchased by Develop UK,[11] ..." etc.
Instead of making these corrections myself, I thought that as you seem to have supervised this article you might prefer to make these corrections yourself.
All the best, Yours, David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidBabsky (talk Edited Fri 2nd Sept 2011, 3:40 pm. DavidBabsky (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC) • contribs) 14:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hi David. Thanks for getting in touch. :-) The problem here is that Wikipedia articles can only use information that has been stated elsewhere - otherwise there's no way for the readers of the article to be able to double-check that information. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth for the background on this - and note that although a lot of what that page says doesn't directly apply here, it still does in general terms. When I was contributing information to the article (which, BTW, was both a pleasure in terms of digging out the information about the cinema's history and development, and a tragedy for how the story ended), I made a point of checking that everything stated in the article could be tied down to reliable external sources. Given the completely open nature of the construction of Wikipedia articles, this strikes me as being a very important approach to stick with (e.g. should the article be vandalised, either on Wikipedia or on a content reuser's site, the errors introduced could be easily identified by a little research). So: please could you publish this information in a source that can be referenced in the article? E.g. could you write an article describing Cine City's history for a local newspaper or historical society publication, or put together a website describing the cinema's history? I'm sure that it would make for fascinating reading, as well as being a good reference for the Wikipedia article. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)