Welcome!

Hello, Dave Cornutt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
And sorry about temporarily notifying you, as if you were the user responsible for them, about the bad edits at Shaker (disambiguation)! I wuz confutzed.
--Jerzyt 15:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Royal Court of China article edit

Hi, Dave. While trying to clean up the The Shakers disambiguation problem from your developing article Royal Court of China — since the noun phrase refers both to the American band and to other groups, notably the Quaker-influenced religious sect — I came across your page and fixed the link at that page so that it is now a redlink pointing to The Shakers (U.S. band). If you or someone else wants to write about that group on its own Wikipedia page, please use that form of the title.

While I was visiting your under-construction page, I made what I consider improvements in organization and linking. Feel free to revert any of the changes I made if you're unhappy with them; I only intended to help you along a bit. I look forward to seeing the Royal Court of China article in the main Wikipedia namespace when you have completed working on it. Cheers!
Objectivesea (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 565, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memorial Parkway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Jordan Lane/Patton Road edit

Here's the overview map you requested. File:Huntsville,_Alabama_-_Jordan_Lane_and_Patton_Road_Overview.png

-- Nhlarry (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is terrific! Thank you. Dave Cornutt (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U.S. Route 431 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Pike or Franklin Pike, eventually passes underneath [[Interstate 65]] to enter the town of [[Franklin, Tennessee|Franklin]. Continuing north, the route pair passes through the exclusive [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 285, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pascual Pérez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Huntsville streets edit

Generally, city streets are not notable enough for their own articles unless they have demonstrated notability, like Broadway (Manhattan). City streets in a mid-sized city are generally not notable enough, even if they have high traffic levels, a lot of roads have high traffic levels. University Drive can be merged into U.S. Route 72, but California Street and Airport Road should probably be deleted. Dough4872 03:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Von Braun Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Spring Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Lane and Patton Road (March 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Regarding your deleted contributions... edit

Hi Dave, I saw that you were deleting some of your recent contributions to various articles, obviously out of some frustration with the Wikipedia standards, system or community. What happened? Greetings, --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Matthiaspaul There seem to be some citation issues related to the deletion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ATermcap#Hazeltine_quirk#Hazeltine_quirk

Shamrock Lee (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jordan Lane and Patton Road concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jordan Lane and Patton Road, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jordan Lane and Patton Road edit

 

Hello Dave Cornutt. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jordan Lane and Patton Road".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jordan Lane and Patton Road}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Data General RDOS, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assembler, TECO and Linker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Dave Cornutt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Dave Cornutt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Dave Cornutt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply