Welcome!

Hello, Darktower 12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darktower 12345

Orphaned non-free image File:Uxm449.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Uxm449.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Archenemy edit

Very well. I don't have an problem with this. The main problem is an IP editor doesn't like the other archenemies (Doctor Octopus and Green Goblin) to be considered archenemies and keeps deleting that and that's why he created that discussion. Someone said that they were archenemies too he reverted it and I reverted it back saying that it should be clear on how it works on the archenemy article. But I did agree with Asgardian that using an certain more elaborate sentence instead of the simple term archenemy could be better. Jhenderson777 (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree that more elaborate terms would be nice to add, but archenemy is a very commonly used word in comics, and has certain connotations which are applied uniquely with its use. Aside from that, a 1st-party quote is just about the most powerful thing you can defend a case with on Wikipedia. Personally, I only watch a few pages, including the Venom page, but I'm sure the community can resolve the issue with the IP on those other two pages. --Darktower 12345 20:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I understand and sorry if I give you a hard time. I am normally on or watching something Spidey related or comic book related and I am an natural at patroling List of fictional archenemies on Wikipedia so I already knowing who's archenemy of who in comic books and of comic book characters in particular. Thank you for the source in Webster. Jhenderson777 (talk) 21:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Canon (fiction) edit

Hello Darktower 12345. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Canon (fiction), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Darktower 12345. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply